Samford

18-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

83.6%Samford

16.4%North Alabama

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADSamford -9.4

PROJECTED TOTAL152.7

MODEL MONEYLINESamford -510

North Alabama

9-21

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreSamford 81

Projected Total152.7

Projected ScoreNorth Alabama 72

Team Comparison

SamfordMetricNorth Alabama

54.1MMH Power Index34.9

113.5Offensive Efficiency104.4

108.3Defensive Efficiency116.7

5.2Net Efficiency-12.3

-2.9Strength of Schedule-1.2

14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-16.3

69.5Tempo66.5

54.0%Effective FG%48.9%

13.3%Turnover Rate17.2%

25.3%Offensive Rebound %31.5%

42.5%Free Throw Rate39.1%

3.6Average Margin-8.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Samford HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY83.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSamford holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.1–34.9), offensive efficiency (113.5–104.4), defensive efficiency (108.3–116.7), net efficiency (5.2–-12.3).

North Alabama COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.2–-2.9), offensive rebounding (31.5–25.3).

Final

Samford

97—96

North Alabama

Samford by 1 • 88.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

SamfordTEAM STATNorth Alabama

33-67FG33-74

49.0%FG%45.0%

12-323PT7-23

38.0%3PT%30.0%

19-30FT23-38

63.0%FT%61.0%

43Rebounds44

14Offensive Rebounds18

17Assists19

21Turnovers14

8Steals12

3Blocks3

28Fouls22

Player Box Score

Samford

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jaden Brownell	F	27	8-11	3-6	5-6	8	1	3	0	24
Trey Fort	G	32	6-15	3-8	3-8	7	0	1	0	18
Julian Brown	Guard	23	5-9	2-5	3-3	3	1	0	0	15
Riley Allenspach	F	16	4-5	1-1	3-4	5	1	1	0	12
Josh Holloway	G	26	2-8	0-4	4-5	4	4	1	0	8
Lukas Walls	G	28	2-3	2-2	1-2	2	1	0	0	7
Collin Holloway	Forward	18	3-6	1-2	0-0	3	0	0	0	7
Rylan Jones	Guard	30	2-7	0-3	0-2	3	8	1	0	4
Hamed Olayinka	F	11	1-2	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	3	2
Zion Wilburn	G	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	0	0
Paulie Stramaglia	Guard	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Isaiah West	G	4	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

North Alabama

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jacari Lane	G	43	10-24	4-10	8-10	3	6	5	0	32
Corneilous Williams	F	40	7-9	0-0	3-10	16	0	3	2	17
Taye Fields	Guard	21	5-5	0-0	3-6	4	5	0	0	13
Will Soucie	Guard	36	5-11	1-4	1-2	4	3	2	0	12
Canin Jefferson	G	34	4-13	1-6	3-4	4	4	2	0	12
Donte Bacchus	F	30	1-6	0-0	4-4	10	1	0	1	6
Daniel Ortiz	Guard	14	1-6	1-3	0-0	1	0	0	0	3
Israel Jenrette	C	4	0-0	0-0	1-2	0	0	0	0	1
Kevin de Kovachich	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

88.2Possessions88.2

110.0Offensive Efficiency108.8

108.8Defensive Efficiency110.0

1.1Net Efficiency-1.1

58.2%Effective FG%49.3%

59.7%True Shooting %52.1%

23.8%Turnover Rate15.9%

44.8%Free Throw Rate51.4%

47.8%3-Point Rate31.1%

0.81Assist / Turnover1.36

Game Summary

Samford won by 1 points. The game played at approximately 88.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Effective FG%, Turnover Rate, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.