
Duquesne
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
43.7%Duquesne
56.3%DePaul
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADDePaul -2.4
PROJECTED TOTAL147.7
MODEL MONEYLINEDePaul -129

DePaul
16-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreDuquesne 73
Projected Total147.7
Projected ScoreDePaul 75
Team Comparison
50.7MMH Power Index48.4
110.6Offensive Efficiency103.7
106.2Defensive Efficiency102.7
4.4Net Efficiency1.0
0.6Strength of Schedule2.0
-5.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.6
70.8Tempo67.7
53.4%Effective FG%49.9%
17.7%Turnover Rate17.8%
30.6%Offensive Rebound %29.7%
38.2%Free Throw Rate36.8%
3.1Average Margin0.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Duquesne HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY56.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMDuquesne holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.7–48.4), offensive efficiency (110.6–103.7), net efficiency (4.4–1.0), recent form (-5.9–-6.6).
DePaul COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.7–106.2), strength of schedule (2.0–0.6).