UT Martin

22-11

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

45.1%UT Martin

54.9%Longwood

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADLongwood -1.3

PROJECTED TOTAL142.3

MODEL MONEYLINELongwood -122

Longwood

16-16

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUT Martin 71

Projected Total142.3

Projected ScoreLongwood 72

Team Comparison

UT MartinMetricLongwood

49.8MMH Power Index47

103.8Offensive Efficiency108.1

94.0Defensive Efficiency103.0

9.8Net Efficiency5.1

-4.8Strength of Schedule-6.4

-0.8Last 10 Net Efficiency2.3

67.2Tempo71.9

49.5%Effective FG%51.4%

21.4%Turnover Rate19.3%

37.9%Offensive Rebound %35.4%

37.5%Free Throw Rate42.0%

6.6Average Margin3.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UT Martin HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY54.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Martin holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.8–47.0), defensive efficiency (94.0–103.0), net efficiency (9.8–5.1), strength of schedule (-4.8–-6.4).

Longwood COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (108.1–103.8), recent form (2.3–-0.8), shooting efficiency (51.4–49.5).

Final

UT Martin

62—64

Longwood

Longwood by 2 • 68.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT MartinTEAM STATLongwood

19-60FG20-54

32.0%FG%37.0%

10-353PT7-27

29.0%3PT%26.0%

14-17FT17-21

82.0%FT%81.0%

38Rebounds40

15Offensive Rebounds13

11Assists9

16Turnovers16

13Steals7

1Blocks2

15Fouls15

Player Box Score

UT Martin

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Josue Grullon	G	26	7-13	6-10	2-2	1	1	3	0	22
Tarence Guinyard	G	26	3-8	1-5	2-2	4	1	2	0	9
Vlad Salaridze	F	22	2-5	1-1	4-4	8	1	2	0	9
Stefano Faloppa	F	18	2-8	0-2	1-1	3	1	1	0	5
Matija Žužic	G	14	2-4	1-3	0-0	1	0	1	0	5
Lamine Niang	F	24	1-2	0-0	2-4	10	0	1	1	4
Afan Trnka	G	28	0-7	0-6	3-4	2	3	0	0	3
AJ Hopkins	F	17	1-5	1-5	0-0	3	0	1	0	3
Carlos Cortijo	Guard	25	1-8	0-3	0-0	1	4	2	0	2

Longwood

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
KJ McClurg	G	31	7-14	5-11	6-6	2	0	2	0	25
Johan Nziemi	F	20	3-6	0-0	2-4	2	0	1	1	8
Jaylen Benard	G	15	3-5	2-3	0-0	6	1	0	1	8
Kyrell Luc	Guard	22	1-3	0-2	4-5	5	4	1	0	6
Colby Garland	G	24	2-7	0-1	0-0	3	3	1	0	4
Elijah Tucker	F	14	2-3	0-0	0-0	2	0	1	0	4
Michael Christmas	Forward	30	1-6	0-5	0-0	5	0	0	0	2
Emanuel Richards	G	18	1-5	0-2	0-0	3	0	0	0	2
Angelo Brizzi	G	16	0-3	0-2	2-2	2	1	1	0	2
Trey Hicks	Forward	6	0-1	0-0	2-2	2	0	0	0	2
DJ Jefferson	G	3	0-1	0-1	1-2	2	0	0	0	1
Leo Nordberg	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

68.1Possessions68.1

91.0Offensive Efficiency94.0

94.0Defensive Efficiency91.0

-2.9Net Efficiency2.9

40.0%Effective FG%43.5%

45.5%True Shooting %50.0%

23.2%Turnover Rate23.9%

28.3%Free Throw Rate38.9%

58.3%3-Point Rate50.0%

0.69Assist / Turnover0.56

Game Summary

Longwood won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 68.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.