Notre Dame

13-17

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

33.0%Notre Dame

67.0%Georgetown

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADGeorgetown -5.3

PROJECTED TOTAL141.3

MODEL MONEYLINEGeorgetown -203

Georgetown

13-18

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNotre Dame 68

Projected Total141.3

Projected ScoreGeorgetown 73

Team Comparison

Notre DameMetricGeorgetown

49.7MMH Power Index51.5

110.3Offensive Efficiency107.2

111.2Defensive Efficiency107.4

-0.9Net Efficiency-0.2

4.7Strength of Schedule4.4

-11.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.8

68.0Tempo61.7

53.0%Effective FG%49.2%

17.0%Turnover Rate16.4%

31.4%Offensive Rebound %32.3%

34.7%Free Throw Rate38.3%

-0.6Average Margin-0.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Georgetown HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY67.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGeorgetown holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.5–49.7), defensive efficiency (107.4–111.2), net efficiency (-0.2–-0.9), recent form (-4.8–-11.6).

Notre Dame COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (110.3–107.2), strength of schedule (4.7–4.4), shooting efficiency (53.0–49.2).

Final

Notre Dame

84—63

Georgetown

Notre Dame by 21 • 64.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Notre DameTEAM STATGeorgetown

32-54FG22-70

59.0%FG%31.0%

9-213PT8-32

43.0%3PT%25.0%

11-12FT11-16

92.0%FT%69.0%

42Rebounds33

8Offensive Rebounds18

20Assists15

12Turnovers5

3Steals7

2Blocks2

17Fouls16

Player Box Score

Notre Dame

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Matt Allocco	Guard	35	6-10	4-8	1-2	5	7	0	0	17
Markus Burton	G	30	4-11	0-2	8-8	3	5	1	0	16
Tae Davis	F	20	5-6	1-1	2-2	8	0	0	0	13
Braeden Shrewsberry	G	34	4-8	1-3	0-0	5	2	1	0	9
Burke Chebuhar	Forward	10	3-3	3-3	0-0	3	1	0	0	9
Kebba Njie	F	21	4-5	0-1	0-0	5	1	0	2	8
Nikita Konstantynovskyi	Forward	15	4-5	0-0	0-0	8	0	0	0	8
J.R. Konieczny	F	19	1-4	0-2	0-0	3	3	0	0	2
Logan Imes	G	3	1-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	1	0	2
Julian Roper II	Guard	10	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	0	0
Garrett Sundra	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Cole Certa	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Georgetown

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Malik Mack	G	36	5-15	4-8	2-3	6	5	2	0	16
Jayden Epps	G	36	5-17	3-9	0-0	0	2	3	0	13
Thomas Sorber	Forward	23	3-9	0-2	6-8	4	4	0	0	12
Micah Peavy	Not Available	26	4-9	0-2	0-0	2	0	0	0	8
Jordan Burks	F	18	2-8	0-3	1-1	4	1	1	1	5
Drew McKenna	G	9	1-2	1-2	0-0	2	0	0	0	3
Caleb Williams	F	14	0-1	0-0	2-2	5	2	1	0	2
Julius Halaifonua	C	14	1-3	0-2	0-0	3	0	0	1	2
Drew Fielder	C	13	1-3	0-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Kayvaun Mulready	G	5	0-1	0-1	0-2	0	1	0	0	0
Curtis Williams Jr.	G	5	0-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Austin Montgomery	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

64.2Possessions64.2

130.8Offensive Efficiency98.1

98.1Defensive Efficiency130.8

32.7Net Efficiency-32.7

67.6%Effective FG%37.1%

70.4%True Shooting %40.6%

18.8%Turnover Rate7.7%

22.2%Free Throw Rate22.9%

38.9%3-Point Rate45.7%

1.67Assist / Turnover3.00

Game Summary

Notre Dame won by 21 points. The game played at approximately 64.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.