UT Rio Grande Valley

19-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

69.1%UT Rio Grande Valley

30.9%Tennessee Tech

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -4.6

PROJECTED TOTAL147.8

MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -224

Tennessee Tech

13-18

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 76

Projected Total147.8

Projected ScoreTennessee Tech 72

Team Comparison

UT Rio Grande ValleyMetricTennessee Tech

55.8MMH Power Index44

112.6Offensive Efficiency105.4

103.1Defensive Efficiency107.0

9.5Net Efficiency-1.6

-1.9Strength of Schedule-3.8

12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency4.4

67.4Tempo69.6

55.7%Effective FG%50.4%

17.9%Turnover Rate19.1%

29.2%Offensive Rebound %32.0%

29.6%Free Throw Rate37.2%

6.4Average Margin-1.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY69.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–44.0), offensive efficiency (112.6–105.4), defensive efficiency (103.1–107.0), net efficiency (9.5–-1.6).

Tennessee Tech COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (32.0–29.2), free throw rate (37.2–29.6).

Final

UT Rio Grande Valley

83—58

Tennessee Tech

UT Rio Grande Valley by 25 • 67.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT Rio Grande ValleyTEAM STATTennessee Tech

31-64FG23-61

48.0%FG%38.0%

10-303PT11-35

33.0%3PT%31.0%

11-15FT1-2

73.0%FT%50.0%

47Rebounds24

16Offensive Rebounds7

17Assists10

12Turnovers13

7Steals7

1Blocks1

10Fouls16

Player Box Score

UT Rio Grande Valley

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Hasan Abdul Hakim	G	30	5-11	2-3	3-4	5	2	0	0	15
Trey Miller	G	28	4-10	1-4	3-4	1	4	2	0	12
DK Thorn	Guard	27	5-11	0-5	1-1	2	4	2	0	11
Howie Fleming Jr.	G	20	5-5	1-1	0-0	9	3	2	0	11
K.T. Raimey	Guard	20	3-8	3-7	0-0	1	1	0	0	9
Tommy Gankhuyag	Forward	16	3-7	1-4	1-2	4	1	0	1	8
Kwo Agwa	F	15	2-2	0-0	3-4	4	0	0	0	7
Cliff Davis	G	21	2-6	2-5	0-0	7	2	1	0	6
Marshal Destremau	F	9	1-2	0-1	0-0	5	0	0	0	2
RJ Nance	Guard	2	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
J.J. Howard	Guard	10	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Jaylen Washington	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Tennessee Tech

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jaylon Johnson	G	35	5-11	3-8	0-0	3	3	2	0	13
Rodney Johnson Jr.	F	30	4-11	3-6	1-2	3	0	2	0	12
Matthew Sells	Guard	18	3-6	3-5	0-0	1	0	0	0	9
Daniel Egbuniwe	F	21	4-8	0-3	0-0	8	3	0	0	8
Kyle Layton	G	30	2-8	2-7	0-0	0	1	2	0	6
Ola Ajiboye	F	17	3-6	0-0	0-0	2	0	1	0	6
Ray Glasgow	SG	12	2-6	0-3	0-0	0	1	0	0	4
Grant Strong	Guard	17	0-2	0-1	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
Grant Slatten	G	15	0-2	0-1	0-0	1	1	0	1	0
Rylee Samons	Forward	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Bogdan Zimonjic	Guard	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

67.6Possessions67.6

122.8Offensive Efficiency85.8

85.8Defensive Efficiency122.8

37.0Net Efficiency-37.0

56.3%Effective FG%46.7%

58.3%True Shooting %46.8%

17.9%Turnover Rate19.1%

23.4%Free Throw Rate3.3%

46.9%3-Point Rate57.4%

1.42Assist / Turnover0.77

Game Summary

UT Rio Grande Valley won by 25 points. The game played at approximately 67.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.