
Hofstra
24-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
58.9%Hofstra
41.1%Massachusetts
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHofstra -1.7
PROJECTED TOTAL152.1
MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -143

Massachusetts
17-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHofstra 77
Projected Total152.1
Projected ScoreMassachusetts 75
Team Comparison
59.3MMH Power Index51.5
114.0Offensive Efficiency110.3
100.9Defensive Efficiency106.7
13.1Net Efficiency3.6
-2.9Strength of Schedule0.9
14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.2
66.2Tempo72.8
52.2%Effective FG%53.2%
16.1%Turnover Rate17.9%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %33.7%
32.0%Free Throw Rate37.7%
8.7Average Margin2.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Hofstra HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY58.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–51.5), offensive efficiency (114.0–110.3), defensive efficiency (100.9–106.7), net efficiency (13.1–3.6).
Massachusetts COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.9–-2.9), shooting efficiency (53.2–52.2), free throw rate (37.7–32.0).