Georgia Southern logo

Georgia Southern

21-16
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
26.3%Georgia Southern
73.7%William & Mary
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADWilliam & Mary -8.1
PROJECTED TOTAL165.3
MODEL MONEYLINEWilliam & Mary -280
William & Mary logo

William & Mary

20-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreGeorgia Southern 79
Projected Total165.3
Projected ScoreWilliam & Mary 87

Team Comparison

49.1MMH Power Index53.8
112.3Offensive Efficiency112.5
110.6Defensive Efficiency105.2
1.7Net Efficiency7.3
-2.2Strength of Schedule-1.5
1.7Last 10 Net Efficiency3.5
72.0Tempo73.9
52.1%Effective FG%55.3%
14.5%Turnover Rate16.4%
28.6%Offensive Rebound %26.7%
39.5%Free Throw Rate45.3%
1.2Average Margin5.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

William & Mary HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY73.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWilliam & Mary holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.8–49.1), offensive efficiency (112.5–112.3), defensive efficiency (105.2–110.6), net efficiency (7.3–1.7).
Georgia Southern COUNTERS WITHball security (14.5–16.4), offensive rebounding (28.6–26.7).
Final
Georgia Southern logo
Georgia Southern
87—102
William & Mary logo
William & Mary
William & Mary by 15 • 80.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Georgia SouthernTEAM STATWilliam & Mary
31-66FG33-67
47.0%FG%49.0%
10-333PT16-44
30.0%3PT%36.0%
15-24FT20-26
63.0%FT%77.0%
40Rebounds38
14Offensive Rebounds10
7Assists18
17Turnovers11
5Steals9
1Blocks1
21Fouls20

Player Box Score

Georgia Southern
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Nakavieon WhiteF298-163-86-762100025
Nate BraffordF234-52-31-231000011
Adante' HolimanG233-101-53-431100010
Eren BanksG253-53-40-23000009
Bradley DouglasG283-120-72-20020008
Micah SmithF143-50-01-26001007
Dontae HorneG172-61-41-41200006
Eugene Brown IIIForward182-30-11-14000005
Tyson BrownF91-10-00-02100002
Avantae ParkerF61-10-00-03000002
Collin KuhlF21-10-00-02000002
Braylhan ThomasG60-10-10-02010000
William & Mary
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Noah CollierF207-70-05-873010019
Gabe DorseyGuard276-145-130-030100017
Kyle PulliamG145-113-82-211000015
Malachi NdurForward153-53-53-422000012
Chase LoweG233-40-15-6104300011
Isaiah MbengG224-63-40-023100011
Keller BoothbyForward262-72-70-02030006
Matteus CaseGuard223-50-10-02300006
Finn LallyF140-30-14-41010004
Ryan Jackson Jr.G30-00-01-20000001
Kyle FrazierG140-50-40-00200000

Advanced Game Stats

80.4Possessions80.4
108.2Offensive Efficiency126.9
126.9Defensive Efficiency108.2
-18.7Net Efficiency18.7
54.5%Effective FG%61.2%
56.2%True Shooting %64.3%
21.1%Turnover Rate13.7%
36.4%Free Throw Rate38.8%
50.0%3-Point Rate65.7%
0.41Assist / Turnover1.64
Game Summary
William & Mary won by 15 points. The game played at approximately 80.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.