
Stonehill
12-21GAME THAT MATTERSAT
18.2%Stonehill
81.8%Lindenwood
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLindenwood -11.1
PROJECTED TOTAL142.8
MODEL MONEYLINELindenwood -449

Lindenwood
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreStonehill 66
Projected Total142.8
Projected ScoreLindenwood 77
Team Comparison
37.9MMH Power Index46.8
97.5Offensive Efficiency105.5
100.7Defensive Efficiency98.6
-3.2Net Efficiency6.9
-5.4Strength of Schedule-6.8
-3.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.4
68.1Tempo73.7
48.0%Effective FG%50.2%
19.1%Turnover Rate18.3%
28.4%Offensive Rebound %34.0%
29.2%Free Throw Rate37.9%
-2.2Average Margin5.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Lindenwood HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY81.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLindenwood holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (46.8–37.9), offensive efficiency (105.5–97.5), defensive efficiency (98.6–100.7), net efficiency (6.9–-3.2).
Stonehill COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-5.4–-6.8).