Stonehill logo

Stonehill

12-21
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
18.2%Stonehill
81.8%Lindenwood
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLindenwood -11.1
PROJECTED TOTAL142.8
MODEL MONEYLINELindenwood -449
Lindenwood logo

Lindenwood

18-15
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreStonehill 66
Projected Total142.8
Projected ScoreLindenwood 77

Team Comparison

37.9MMH Power Index46.8
97.5Offensive Efficiency105.5
100.7Defensive Efficiency98.6
-3.2Net Efficiency6.9
-5.4Strength of Schedule-6.8
-3.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.4
68.1Tempo73.7
48.0%Effective FG%50.2%
19.1%Turnover Rate18.3%
28.4%Offensive Rebound %34.0%
29.2%Free Throw Rate37.9%
-2.2Average Margin5.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Lindenwood HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY81.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLindenwood holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (46.8–37.9), offensive efficiency (105.5–97.5), defensive efficiency (98.6–100.7), net efficiency (6.9–-3.2).
Stonehill COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-5.4–-6.8).
Final
Stonehill logo
Stonehill
74—75
Lindenwood logo
Lindenwood
Lindenwood by 1 • 67.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

StonehillTEAM STATLindenwood
24-51FG24-59
47.0%FG%41.0%
15-303PT8-25
50.0%3PT%32.0%
11-17FT19-24
65.0%FT%79.0%
29Rebounds40
5Offensive Rebounds15
19Assists8
13Turnovers12
6Steals9
3Blocks6
22Fouls18

Player Box Score

Stonehill
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Josh MorganGuard324-144-84-660000016
Hermann KoffiG355-73-51-142000014
Ethan MeuserF254-54-51-144030013
Todd BrognaF263-51-23-412000010
Louie SemonaF112-52-40-02010006
Chas StinsonG222-60-21-33510005
Amir NesbittGuard222-61-30-13420005
Christopher MelisForward192-20-01-13220005
Alex Bates IVGuard80-10-10-00000000
Lindenwood
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Anias FutrellG367-163-77-7113320024
Jadis JonesG294-70-06-1010220014
Clayton JacksonG274-62-42-230000012
Reggie BassGuard312-92-62-24210008
Jordan WildyForward253-81-40-02111007
Markeith Browning IINot Available243-80-30-02120006
Colin RuffinG81-20-02-35000004
Jaylon McDanielF130-20-00-02101000
Nathan Johnson Jr.Guard70-10-10-03000000

Advanced Game Stats

67.3Possessions67.3
110.0Offensive Efficiency111.4
111.4Defensive Efficiency110.0
-1.5Net Efficiency1.5
61.8%Effective FG%47.5%
62.6%True Shooting %53.3%
19.4%Turnover Rate17.8%
33.3%Free Throw Rate40.7%
58.8%3-Point Rate42.4%
1.46Assist / Turnover0.67
Game Summary
Lindenwood won by 1 points. The game played at approximately 67.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Effective FG%, True Shooting %, Free Throw Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.