
Princeton
9-20GAME THAT MATTERSAT
16.2%Princeton
83.8%Merrimack
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMerrimack -11.1
PROJECTED TOTAL136.7
MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -517

Merrimack
23-11MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScorePrinceton 63
Projected Total136.7
Projected ScoreMerrimack 74
Team Comparison
43.5MMH Power Index53.7
105.1Offensive Efficiency106.4
110.3Defensive Efficiency103.2
-5.2Net Efficiency3.2
1.7Strength of Schedule0.7
-8.2Last 10 Net Efficiency12.9
65.2Tempo64.4
50.3%Effective FG%49.3%
16.9%Turnover Rate14.8%
27.5%Offensive Rebound %24.7%
35.0%Free Throw Rate39.5%
-3.4Average Margin2.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Merrimack HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY83.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–43.5), offensive efficiency (106.4–105.1), defensive efficiency (103.2–110.3), net efficiency (3.2–-5.2).
Princeton COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.7–0.7), shooting efficiency (50.3–49.3), offensive rebounding (27.5–24.7).