
Quinnipiac
19-13GAME THAT MATTERSAT
24.0%Quinnipiac
76.0%Navy
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADNavy -8.7
PROJECTED TOTAL143.4
MODEL MONEYLINENavy -317

Navy
26-8MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 67
Projected Total143.4
Projected ScoreNavy 76
Team Comparison
51MMH Power Index56.8
106.8Offensive Efficiency113.2
102.1Defensive Efficiency97.6
4.7Net Efficiency15.6
-2.3Strength of Schedule-8.1
2.2Last 10 Net Efficiency16.4
70.5Tempo65.9
48.9%Effective FG%53.7%
15.6%Turnover Rate17.1%
34.1%Offensive Rebound %33.2%
34.1%Free Throw Rate40.9%
3.4Average Margin10.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Navy HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY76.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNavy holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.8–51.0), offensive efficiency (113.2–106.8), defensive efficiency (97.6–102.1), net efficiency (15.6–4.7).
Quinnipiac COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-2.3–-8.1), ball security (15.6–17.1), offensive rebounding (34.1–33.2).