Quinnipiac logo

Quinnipiac

19-13
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
24.0%Quinnipiac
76.0%Navy
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADNavy -8.7
PROJECTED TOTAL143.4
MODEL MONEYLINENavy -317
Navy logo

Navy

26-8
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 67
Projected Total143.4
Projected ScoreNavy 76

Team Comparison

51MMH Power Index56.8
106.8Offensive Efficiency113.2
102.1Defensive Efficiency97.6
4.7Net Efficiency15.6
-2.3Strength of Schedule-8.1
2.2Last 10 Net Efficiency16.4
70.5Tempo65.9
48.9%Effective FG%53.7%
15.6%Turnover Rate17.1%
34.1%Offensive Rebound %33.2%
34.1%Free Throw Rate40.9%
3.4Average Margin10.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Navy HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY76.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNavy holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.8–51.0), offensive efficiency (113.2–106.8), defensive efficiency (97.6–102.1), net efficiency (15.6–4.7).
Quinnipiac COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-2.3–-8.1), ball security (15.6–17.1), offensive rebounding (34.1–33.2).
Final
Quinnipiac logo
Quinnipiac
74—63
Navy logo
Navy
Quinnipiac by 11 • 67.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

QuinnipiacTEAM STATNavy
23-53FG23-63
43.0%FG%37.0%
5-173PT8-29
29.0%3PT%28.0%
23-30FT9-17
77.0%FT%53.0%
39Rebounds38
12Offensive Rebounds17
11Assists14
12Turnovers13
10Steals4
4Blocks4
18Fouls22

Player Box Score

Quinnipiac
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Amarri MonroeF276-122-42-242210016
Doug YoungG264-92-52-251000012
Ryan MabreyG224-71-22-412100011
Savion LewisGuard373-70-03-42531009
Khaden BennettG231-30-17-86010009
Paul OtienoF303-40-10-110112006
Jaden ZimmermanG151-70-14-64000006
Spence WeweF51-10-01-11010003
Grant RandallF120-20-22-23010002
Richie SpringsForward30-10-10-00000000
Navy
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Sam KristG274-74-73-330210015
Jordan PennickG295-102-70-020100012
Austin BenigniG263-120-24-613010010
Aidan KehoeC243-60-00-312310006
Jack MedalieForward232-70-42-27201006
Mitch FischerForward162-51-30-22000005
Carnegie JohnsonGuard142-61-30-02500005
Donovan DraperF172-50-00-04001004
Jinwoo KimG120-30-10-01100000
Lysander RehnstromGuard90-20-20-00000000
David BurnettG30-00-00-11000000

Advanced Game Stats

67.2Possessions67.2
110.1Offensive Efficiency93.8
93.8Defensive Efficiency110.1
16.4Net Efficiency-16.4
48.1%Effective FG%42.9%
55.0%True Shooting %44.3%
17.8%Turnover Rate19.4%
56.6%Free Throw Rate27.0%
32.1%3-Point Rate46.0%
0.92Assist / Turnover1.08
Game Summary
Quinnipiac won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 67.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.