
Longwood
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
75.4%Longwood
24.6%Binghamton
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLongwood -7.0
PROJECTED TOTAL145.5
MODEL MONEYLINELongwood -307

Binghamton
8-22MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLongwood 76
Projected Total145.5
Projected ScoreBinghamton 69
Team Comparison
47MMH Power Index32.4
108.1Offensive Efficiency102.2
103.0Defensive Efficiency112.3
5.1Net Efficiency-10.1
-6.4Strength of Schedule-6.0
2.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.2
71.9Tempo64.2
51.4%Effective FG%51.3%
19.3%Turnover Rate18.5%
35.4%Offensive Rebound %21.5%
42.0%Free Throw Rate42.8%
3.6Average Margin-6.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Longwood HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY75.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLongwood holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.0–32.4), offensive efficiency (108.1–102.2), defensive efficiency (103.0–112.3), net efficiency (5.1–-10.1).
Binghamton COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-6.0–-6.4), ball security (18.5–19.3), free throw rate (42.8–42.0).