
Niagara
8-22GAME THAT MATTERSAT
6.8%Niagara
93.2%Bowling Green
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBowling Green -19.3
PROJECTED TOTAL144.6
MODEL MONEYLINEBowling Green -1371

Bowling Green
18-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreNiagara 63
Projected Total144.6
Projected ScoreBowling Green 82
Team Comparison
35.8MMH Power Index54.7
100.8Offensive Efficiency112.6
112.4Defensive Efficiency99.1
-11.6Net Efficiency13.5
-0.8Strength of Schedule-4.7
-5.6Last 10 Net Efficiency1.4
63.4Tempo72.2
50.9%Effective FG%53.4%
18.8%Turnover Rate15.9%
24.9%Offensive Rebound %29.2%
27.3%Free Throw Rate38.7%
-7.4Average Margin9.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Bowling Green HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY93.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBowling Green holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.7–35.8), offensive efficiency (112.6–100.8), defensive efficiency (99.1–112.4), net efficiency (13.5–-11.6).
Niagara COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.8–-4.7).