North Dakota

18-17

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

23.5%North Dakota

76.5%Notre Dame

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADNotre Dame -7.9

PROJECTED TOTAL154.8

MODEL MONEYLINENotre Dame -326

Notre Dame

13-17

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNorth Dakota 73

Projected Total154.8

Projected ScoreNotre Dame 81

Team Comparison

North DakotaMetricNotre Dame

43.7MMH Power Index49.7

109.2Offensive Efficiency110.3

110.2Defensive Efficiency111.2

-1.0Net Efficiency-0.9

-3.4Strength of Schedule4.7

-7.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.6

70.1Tempo68.0

50.1%Effective FG%53.0%

14.0%Turnover Rate17.0%

28.9%Offensive Rebound %31.4%

37.5%Free Throw Rate34.7%

-0.7Average Margin-0.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Notre Dame HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY76.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNotre Dame holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.7–43.7), offensive efficiency (110.3–109.2), net efficiency (-0.9–-1.0), strength of schedule (4.7–-3.4).

North Dakota COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (110.2–111.2), recent form (-7.2–-11.6), ball security (14.0–17.0).

Final

North Dakota

58—75

Notre Dame

Notre Dame by 17 • 67.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

North DakotaTEAM STATNotre Dame

22-64FG32-62

34.0%FG%52.0%

9-273PT3-17

33.0%3PT%18.0%

5-8FT8-10

63.0%FT%80.0%

38Rebounds36

14Offensive Rebounds7

10Assists12

15Turnovers7

1Steals9

3Blocks3

13Fouls11

Player Box Score

North Dakota

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Treysen Eaglestaff	F	32	5-13	3-6	0-2	3	3	0	0	13
Dariyus Woodson	F	27	4-9	3-7	0-0	3	1	0	0	11
Mier Panoam	G	27	3-11	2-4	3-3	8	2	1	1	11
Amar Kuljuhovic	G	23	4-10	0-3	1-2	1	0	0	0	9
Eli King	G	32	3-11	0-2	0-0	9	2	0	1	6
George Natsvlishvili	F	14	2-3	1-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	5
Brian Mathews	Forward	17	1-3	0-0	1-1	6	0	0	0	3
Reggie Thomas	G	13	0-2	0-2	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Mambourou Mara	F	8	0-0	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	1	0
Zach Kraft	G	7	0-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Notre Dame

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Markus Burton	G	34	13-20	2-4	1-1	9	3	2	0	29
J.R. Konieczny	F	19	6-9	0-2	0-0	4	0	0	0	12
Tae Davis	F	24	3-5	0-0	2-2	5	1	1	1	8
Braeden Shrewsberry	G	28	3-11	0-7	0-0	1	2	0	0	6
Kebba Njie	F	21	2-4	1-1	0-0	4	2	0	1	5
Nikita Konstantynovskyi	Forward	16	2-4	0-1	1-3	5	0	1	0	5
Matt Allocco	Guard	30	1-3	0-0	2-2	4	2	0	0	4
Julian Roper II	Guard	22	2-6	0-2	0-0	3	2	5	1	4
Burke Chebuhar	Forward	4	0-0	0-0	2-2	0	0	0	0	2
Logan Imes	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

67.8Possessions67.8

85.5Offensive Efficiency110.6

110.6Defensive Efficiency85.5

-25.1Net Efficiency25.1

41.4%Effective FG%54.0%

42.8%True Shooting %56.2%

21.8%Turnover Rate10.5%

12.5%Free Throw Rate16.1%

42.2%3-Point Rate27.4%

0.67Assist / Turnover1.71

Game Summary

Notre Dame won by 17 points. The game played at approximately 67.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.