
Bethune-Cookman
17-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
37.3%Bethune-Cookman
62.7%Tulane
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTulane -4.1
PROJECTED TOTAL152.2
MODEL MONEYLINETulane -168

Tulane
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBethune-Cookman 74
Projected Total152.2
Projected ScoreTulane 78
Team Comparison
44.2MMH Power Index44.3
104.7Offensive Efficiency105.3
106.9Defensive Efficiency109.9
-2.2Net Efficiency-4.6
-3.3Strength of Schedule2.7
4.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3
72.0Tempo68.7
51.9%Effective FG%49.6%
19.2%Turnover Rate15.6%
30.3%Offensive Rebound %22.8%
41.9%Free Throw Rate44.8%
-1.6Average Margin-3.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Bethune-Cookman HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY62.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBethune-Cookman holds the advantage in defensive efficiency (106.9–109.9), net efficiency (-2.2–-4.6), recent form (4.0–-10.3), shooting efficiency (51.9–49.6).
Tulane COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (44.3–44.2), offensive efficiency (105.3–104.7), strength of schedule (2.7–-3.3).