
Pepperdine
9-23GAME THAT MATTERSAT
10.6%Pepperdine
89.4%UNLV
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUNLV -14.5
PROJECTED TOTAL157.8
MODEL MONEYLINEUNLV -843

UNLV
18-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScorePepperdine 72
Projected Total157.8
Projected ScoreUNLV 86
Team Comparison
38.2MMH Power Index52.8
103.2Offensive Efficiency111.0
113.6Defensive Efficiency109.6
-10.4Net Efficiency1.4
0.7Strength of Schedule2.7
-10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency1.1
70.0Tempo71.4
48.7%Effective FG%53.7%
18.3%Turnover Rate17.2%
31.1%Offensive Rebound %30.8%
34.0%Free Throw Rate41.6%
-7.3Average Margin1.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UNLV HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY89.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUNLV holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.8–38.2), offensive efficiency (111.0–103.2), defensive efficiency (109.6–113.6), net efficiency (1.4–-10.4).
Pepperdine COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (31.1–30.8).