Bryant logo

Bryant

9-22
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
28.2%Bryant
71.8%Stonehill
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADStonehill -7.6
PROJECTED TOTAL134.9
MODEL MONEYLINEStonehill -255
Stonehill logo

Stonehill

12-21
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBryant 64
Projected Total134.9
Projected ScoreStonehill 71

Team Comparison

34.1MMH Power Index37.9
98.6Offensive Efficiency97.5
110.2Defensive Efficiency100.7
-11.6Net Efficiency-3.2
-1.3Strength of Schedule-5.4
-10.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-3.4
65.8Tempo68.1
48.0%Effective FG%48.0%
20.0%Turnover Rate19.1%
28.1%Offensive Rebound %28.4%
31.2%Free Throw Rate29.2%
-7.6Average Margin-2.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Stonehill HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY71.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMStonehill holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (37.9–34.1), defensive efficiency (100.7–110.2), net efficiency (-3.2–-11.6), recent form (-3.4–-10.0).
Bryant COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (98.6–97.5), strength of schedule (-1.3–-5.4), free throw rate (31.2–29.2).
Final
Bryant logo
Bryant
66—67
Stonehill logo
Stonehill
Stonehill by 1 • 68.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

BryantTEAM STATStonehill
22-60FG24-66
37.0%FG%36.0%
6-193PT5-22
32.0%3PT%23.0%
16-21FT14-21
76.0%FT%67.0%
35Rebounds51
9Offensive Rebounds19
8Assists10
8Turnovers11
7Steals1
11Blocks2
17Fouls19

Player Box Score

Bryant
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Earl TimberlakeGuard335-140-14-762030014
Connor WithersForward323-73-54-450230013
Rafael PinzonGuard304-92-32-210110012
Kam FarrisGuard282-101-54-44220009
Keyshawn MitchellF253-60-21-211024007
Barry EvansF333-90-20-03400006
Jakai RobinsonG192-50-11-23000005
Stonehill
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Josh MorganGuard317-152-66-912100022
Amir NesbittGuard276-103-72-423000017
Todd BrognaF324-110-12-2151000010
Hermann KoffiG373-90-40-02000006
Chas StinsonG221-80-23-46000005
Christopher MelisForward222-50-00-09200004
Louie SemonaF61-10-00-00200002
Ethan MeuserF210-60-21-27002001
Pearse McGuinnF20-10-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

68.5Possessions68.5
96.4Offensive Efficiency97.8
97.8Defensive Efficiency96.4
-1.5Net Efficiency1.5
41.7%Effective FG%40.2%
47.2%True Shooting %44.1%
11.6%Turnover Rate16.2%
35.0%Free Throw Rate31.8%
31.7%3-Point Rate33.3%
1.00Assist / Turnover0.91
Game Summary
Stonehill won by 1 points. The game played at approximately 68.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Turnover Rate, Free Throw Rate, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.