
Niagara
8-22GAME THAT MATTERSAT
6.8%Niagara
93.2%Kent State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADKent State -17.9
PROJECTED TOTAL151.2
MODEL MONEYLINEKent State -1371

Kent State
24-10MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreNiagara 67
Projected Total151.2
Projected ScoreKent State 85
Team Comparison
35.8MMH Power Index54.7
100.8Offensive Efficiency113.9
112.4Defensive Efficiency107.6
-11.6Net Efficiency6.3
-0.8Strength of Schedule-0.1
-5.6Last 10 Net Efficiency2.1
63.4Tempo74.0
50.9%Effective FG%53.0%
18.8%Turnover Rate17.7%
24.9%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
27.3%Free Throw Rate43.5%
-7.4Average Margin4.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Kent State HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY93.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
11–0
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMKent State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.7–35.8), offensive efficiency (113.9–100.8), defensive efficiency (107.6–112.4), net efficiency (6.3–-11.6).