
Radford
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
13.6%Radford
86.4%Clemson
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADClemson -12.5
PROJECTED TOTAL149.6
MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -635

Clemson
24-10MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreRadford 69
Projected Total149.6
Projected ScoreClemson 81
Team Comparison
47.9MMH Power Index59.9
110.9Offensive Efficiency112.6
107.4Defensive Efficiency101.4
3.5Net Efficiency11.2
-4.6Strength of Schedule4.6
2.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7
73.4Tempo63.6
52.6%Effective FG%53.0%
17.0%Turnover Rate14.0%
31.4%Offensive Rebound %27.0%
41.0%Free Throw Rate38.1%
2.5Average Margin7.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Clemson HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY86.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–47.9), offensive efficiency (112.6–110.9), defensive efficiency (101.4–107.4), net efficiency (11.2–3.5).
Radford COUNTERS WITHrecent form (2.4–-4.7), offensive rebounding (31.4–27.0), free throw rate (41.0–38.1).