Radford logo

Radford

16-16
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
13.6%Radford
86.4%Clemson
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADClemson -12.5
PROJECTED TOTAL149.6
MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -635
Clemson logo

Clemson

24-10
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreRadford 69
Projected Total149.6
Projected ScoreClemson 81

Team Comparison

47.9MMH Power Index59.9
110.9Offensive Efficiency112.6
107.4Defensive Efficiency101.4
3.5Net Efficiency11.2
-4.6Strength of Schedule4.6
2.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7
73.4Tempo63.6
52.6%Effective FG%53.0%
17.0%Turnover Rate14.0%
31.4%Offensive Rebound %27.0%
41.0%Free Throw Rate38.1%
2.5Average Margin7.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Clemson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY86.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–47.9), offensive efficiency (112.6–110.9), defensive efficiency (101.4–107.4), net efficiency (11.2–3.5).
Radford COUNTERS WITHrecent form (2.4–-4.7), offensive rebounding (31.4–27.0), free throw rate (41.0–38.1).
Final
Radford logo
Radford
51—79
Clemson logo
Clemson
Clemson by 28 • 64.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

RadfordTEAM STATClemson
17-55FG25-49
31.0%FG%51.0%
4-203PT11-23
20.0%3PT%48.0%
13-19FT18-22
68.0%FT%82.0%
31Rebounds36
11Offensive Rebounds6
2Assists12
11Turnovers11
9Steals5
1Blocks4
22Fouls18

Player Box Score

Radford
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Zion WalkerG145-90-10-000000010
Jarvis MossGuard273-131-82-32000009
David EarlyGuard152-50-25-73010009
Truth HarrisG132-42-33-40010009
Josiah HarrisF232-60-00-04011004
Brandon MaclinG271-80-21-27230003
Chace DavisGuard121-51-30-02000003
Isaiah GainesF251-10-00-06020002
Ibu YamazakiF210-20-12-30000002
Jonas SirtautasF110-10-00-03010000
TJ NeSmithForward60-00-00-01000000
Tony FelderGuard40-10-00-00000000
Brennan ChatmanGuard20-00-00-00000000
Clemson
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Chauncey WigginsF297-112-40-031000016
Dillon HunterG235-82-43-320200015
Ian SchieffelinForward295-82-22-292000014
Chase HunterGuard294-82-60-250200010
Viktor LakhinCenter192-51-12-25303007
Myles FosterForward110-10-04-64101004
Jake HeidbrederG100-00-03-31300003
Del JonesG91-11-10-01100003
Asa ThomasG61-31-30-00010003
Jaeden ZackeryNot Available260-40-22-23100002
Christian ReevesC90-00-02-22000002

Advanced Game Stats

64.3Possessions64.3
79.3Offensive Efficiency122.9
122.9Defensive Efficiency79.3
-43.5Net Efficiency43.5
34.5%Effective FG%62.2%
39.8%True Shooting %66.4%
17.2%Turnover Rate17.1%
34.5%Free Throw Rate44.9%
36.4%3-Point Rate46.9%
0.18Assist / Turnover1.09
Game Summary
Clemson won by 28 points. The game played at approximately 64.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.