Vanderbilt

27-9

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

62.4%Vanderbilt

37.6%Nevada

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -3.1

PROJECTED TOTAL157.1

MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -166

Nevada

24-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreVanderbilt 80

Projected Total157.1

Projected ScoreNevada 77

Team Comparison

VanderbiltMetricNevada

68.9MMH Power Index59.8

120.9Offensive Efficiency112.4

105.7Defensive Efficiency105.7

15.2Net Efficiency6.7

7.4Strength of Schedule3.7

2.7Last 10 Net Efficiency7.8

70.9Tempo67.7

55.3%Effective FG%50.2%

13.5%Turnover Rate14.8%

30.8%Offensive Rebound %31.9%

39.3%Free Throw Rate46.0%

10.8Average Margin4.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY62.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–59.8), offensive efficiency (120.9–112.4), net efficiency (15.2–6.7), strength of schedule (7.4–3.7).

Nevada COUNTERS WITHrecent form (7.8–2.7), offensive rebounding (31.9–30.8), free throw rate (46.0–39.3).

Final

Vanderbilt

73—71

Nevada

Vanderbilt by 2 • 68.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

VanderbiltTEAM STATNevada

28-59FG29-54

47.0%FG%54.0%

6-153PT6-15

40.0%3PT%40.0%

11-18FT7-10

61.0%FT%70.0%

30Rebounds33

11Offensive Rebounds8

13Assists13

13Turnovers16

10Steals9

3Blocks8

16Fouls15

Player Box Score

Vanderbilt

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
AJ Hoggard	Guard	27	7-12	0-1	4-7	2	7	1	1	18
Jason Edwards	G	29	5-10	2-3	4-5	3	2	3	0	16
MJ Collins Jr.	G	31	6-13	3-5	0-1	1	0	0	0	15
Devin McGlockton	F	30	4-7	0-0	1-2	8	1	0	1	9
Jaylen Carey	F	17	4-9	1-1	0-1	8	0	0	1	9
Tyler Nickel	F	20	1-6	0-4	2-2	2	0	0	0	4
Grant Huffman	Guard	19	1-2	0-1	0-0	1	1	4	0	2
Tyler Tanner	G	15	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	2	0	0
Chris Manon	Guard	12	0-0	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	0	0

Nevada

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kobe Sanders	Guard	35	6-11	1-2	0-0	2	2	0	1	13
Tyler Rolison	G	27	3-5	2-3	5-6	1	2	2	1	13
Brandon Love	Forward	20	5-7	0-0	1-2	4	1	1	2	11
Nick Davidson	F	28	4-9	0-2	1-2	9	1	2	2	9
K.J. Hymes	Forward	16	4-4	0-0	0-0	4	0	1	1	8
Xavier DuSell	Guard	25	2-5	2-4	0-0	2	0	2	0	6
Tre Coleman	Forward	24	2-5	0-1	0-0	1	6	1	0	4
Justin McBride	F	15	2-7	0-2	0-0	4	0	0	0	4
Chuck Bailey III	G	10	1-1	1-1	0-0	1	1	0	1	3

Advanced Game Stats

68.2Possessions68.2

107.0Offensive Efficiency104.1

104.1Defensive Efficiency107.0

2.9Net Efficiency-2.9

52.5%Effective FG%59.3%

54.0%True Shooting %60.4%

18.7%Turnover Rate24.0%

30.5%Free Throw Rate18.5%

25.4%3-Point Rate27.8%

1.00Assist / Turnover0.81

Game Summary

Vanderbilt won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 68.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Effective FG%, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.