
Longwood
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
16.6%Longwood
83.4%UAB
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUAB -10.4
PROJECTED TOTAL155.0
MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -502

UAB
20-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLongwood 72
Projected Total155.0
Projected ScoreUAB 83
Team Comparison
47MMH Power Index56.9
108.1Offensive Efficiency110.5
103.0Defensive Efficiency102.9
5.1Net Efficiency7.6
-6.4Strength of Schedule0.4
2.3Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9
71.9Tempo71.7
51.4%Effective FG%48.8%
19.3%Turnover Rate12.4%
35.4%Offensive Rebound %32.7%
42.0%Free Throw Rate36.9%
3.6Average Margin5.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UAB HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY83.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–47.0), offensive efficiency (110.5–108.1), defensive efficiency (102.9–103.0), net efficiency (7.6–5.1).
Longwood COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (51.4–48.8), offensive rebounding (35.4–32.7), free throw rate (42.0–36.9).