Seton Hall logo

Seton Hall

21-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
13.9%Seton Hall
86.1%Vanderbilt
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -12.2
PROJECTED TOTAL149.5
MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -619
Vanderbilt logo

Vanderbilt

27-9
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSeton Hall 69
Projected Total149.5
Projected ScoreVanderbilt 81

Team Comparison

57.1MMH Power Index68.9
105.8Offensive Efficiency120.9
98.3Defensive Efficiency105.7
7.5Net Efficiency15.2
3.5Strength of Schedule7.4
0.6Last 10 Net Efficiency2.7
66.5Tempo70.9
47.9%Effective FG%55.3%
16.7%Turnover Rate13.5%
34.8%Offensive Rebound %30.8%
35.7%Free Throw Rate39.3%
5.0Average Margin10.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY86.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–57.1), offensive efficiency (120.9–105.8), net efficiency (15.2–7.5), strength of schedule (7.4–3.5).
Seton Hall COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (98.3–105.7), offensive rebounding (34.8–30.8).
Final
Seton Hall logo
Seton Hall
60—76
Vanderbilt logo
Vanderbilt
Vanderbilt by 16 • 66.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Seton HallTEAM STATVanderbilt
23-63FG28-54
37.0%FG%52.0%
7-213PT10-27
33.0%3PT%37.0%
7-11FT10-12
64.0%FT%83.0%
37Rebounds32
16Offensive Rebounds6
11Assists15
16Turnovers11
8Steals9
3Blocks2
14Fouls14

Player Box Score

Seton Hall
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Isaiah ColemanG358-154-70-041100020
Scotty MiddletonF202-71-53-32020008
Prince AligbeF203-70-00-14000006
Dylan Addae-WusuGuard161-41-23-30330006
Jahseem FeltonG102-61-10-02000005
Gus YaldenF112-40-10-03110004
Chaunce JenkinsGuard251-70-21-29200003
Yacine ToumiF201-60-10-04202002
Godswill ErherieneC111-10-00-02000002
Emmanuel OkoraforF91-10-00-24000002
David TubekF91-40-20-01000002
Garwey DualG130-10-00-00211000
David GabrielG10-00-00-00000000
Vanderbilt
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Tyler NickelF268-166-132-240110024
Devin McGlocktonF205-71-22-340100013
Jason EdwardsG154-72-50-002100010
AJ HoggardGuard272-81-32-33610007
Grant HuffmanGuard252-20-02-25220006
Jaylen CareyF203-50-10-08000006
Tyler TannerG212-30-10-01110004
MJ Collins Jr.G241-30-20-01110002
Chris ManonGuard131-10-00-02311002
JaQualon RobertsF20-00-02-20000002
Coleson MesserG20-10-00-01000000
Jordan WilliamsG20-10-00-01000000
Miles KeeffeG20-00-00-00000000
Graham CaltonGuard10-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

66.5Possessions66.5
90.2Offensive Efficiency114.3
114.3Defensive Efficiency90.2
-24.1Net Efficiency24.1
42.1%Effective FG%61.1%
44.0%True Shooting %63.7%
23.5%Turnover Rate17.0%
17.5%Free Throw Rate22.2%
33.3%3-Point Rate50.0%
0.69Assist / Turnover1.36
Game Summary
Vanderbilt won by 16 points. The game played at approximately 66.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.