
Seton Hall
21-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
13.9%Seton Hall
86.1%Vanderbilt
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -12.2
PROJECTED TOTAL149.5
MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -619

Vanderbilt
27-9MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSeton Hall 69
Projected Total149.5
Projected ScoreVanderbilt 81
Team Comparison
57.1MMH Power Index68.9
105.8Offensive Efficiency120.9
98.3Defensive Efficiency105.7
7.5Net Efficiency15.2
3.5Strength of Schedule7.4
0.6Last 10 Net Efficiency2.7
66.5Tempo70.9
47.9%Effective FG%55.3%
16.7%Turnover Rate13.5%
34.8%Offensive Rebound %30.8%
35.7%Free Throw Rate39.3%
5.0Average Margin10.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY86.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–57.1), offensive efficiency (120.9–105.8), net efficiency (15.2–7.5), strength of schedule (7.4–3.5).
Seton Hall COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (98.3–105.7), offensive rebounding (34.8–30.8).