Utah Tech

19-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

46.7%Utah Tech

53.3%Utah

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUtah -0.7

PROJECTED TOTAL155.3

MODEL MONEYLINEUtah -114

Utah

10-22

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUtah Tech 77

Projected Total155.3

Projected ScoreUtah 78

Team Comparison

Utah TechMetricUtah

47.3MMH Power Index43.9

108.8Offensive Efficiency108.8

106.1Defensive Efficiency115.8

2.7Net Efficiency-7.0

-2.3Strength of Schedule5.1

-2.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-16.3

70.6Tempo68.3

54.4%Effective FG%52.3%

17.5%Turnover Rate16.7%

28.1%Offensive Rebound %28.8%

32.8%Free Throw Rate32.2%

1.9Average Margin-4.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Utah Tech HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY53.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUtah Tech holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.3–43.9), defensive efficiency (106.1–115.8), net efficiency (2.7–-7.0), recent form (-2.0–-16.3).

Utah COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.1–-2.3), ball security (16.7–17.5), offensive rebounding (28.8–28.1).

Final

Utah Tech

53—53

Utah

Tied • 76.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Utah TechTEAM STATUtah

20-66FG20-66

30.0%FG%30.0%

7-233PT7-23

30.0%3PT%30.0%

6-14FT6-14

43.0%FT%43.0%

36Rebounds36

11Offensive Rebounds11

8Assists8

15Turnovers15

8Steals8

4Blocks4

13Fouls13

Player Box Score

Utah Tech

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Hakim Byrd	Guard	21	3-8	1-3	1-1	2	2	1	0	8
Tennessee Rainwater	G	20	3-5	1-1	1-2	4	2	2	0	8
Justin Bieker	Guard	29	3-11	0-3	0-0	2	1	2	0	6
Noa Gonsalves	Guard	26	2-8	2-4	0-0	4	1	0	0	6
Unisa Turay	Guard	19	2-5	1-2	1-4	3	0	1	0	6
Britton Berrett	G	18	2-8	2-6	0-0	3	1	0	0	6
Samuel Ariyibi	F	15	2-6	0-0	1-2	6	1	0	2	5
Hunter Schenck	G	17	1-6	0-3	2-2	2	0	1	1	4
Stone Hutchings	Guard	10	2-4	0-1	0-1	1	0	0	0	4
Pavle Misic	Center	10	0-3	0-0	0-2	3	0	0	0	0
Dallin Grant	F	8	0-2	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	0
Sammy Howlin	Center	7	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	1	0

Utah

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Hakim Byrd	Guard	21	3-8	1-3	1-1	2	2	1	0	8
Tennessee Rainwater	G	20	3-5	1-1	1-2	4	2	2	0	8
Justin Bieker	Guard	29	3-11	0-3	0-0	2	1	2	0	6
Noa Gonsalves	Guard	26	2-8	2-4	0-0	4	1	0	0	6
Unisa Turay	Guard	19	2-5	1-2	1-4	3	0	1	0	6
Britton Berrett	G	18	2-8	2-6	0-0	3	1	0	0	6
Samuel Ariyibi	F	15	2-6	0-0	1-2	6	1	0	2	5
Hunter Schenck	G	17	1-6	0-3	2-2	2	0	1	1	4
Stone Hutchings	Guard	10	2-4	0-1	0-1	1	0	0	0	4
Pavle Misic	Center	10	0-3	0-0	0-2	3	0	0	0	0
Dallin Grant	F	8	0-2	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	0
Sammy Howlin	Center	7	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

76.7Possessions76.7

69.1Offensive Efficiency69.1

69.1Defensive Efficiency69.1

0.0Net Efficiency0.0

35.6%Effective FG%35.6%

36.5%True Shooting %36.5%

19.6%Turnover Rate19.6%

21.2%Free Throw Rate21.2%

34.8%3-Point Rate34.8%

0.53Assist / Turnover0.53

Game Summary

Neither team finished level. The game played at approximately 76.7 possessions.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.