Colgate

18-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

28.2%Colgate

71.8%Harvard

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHarvard -7.0

PROJECTED TOTAL144.2

MODEL MONEYLINEHarvard -255

Harvard

17-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreColgate 69

Projected Total144.2

Projected ScoreHarvard 76

Team Comparison

ColgateMetricHarvard

48.8MMH Power Index52.6

111.7Offensive Efficiency108.1

109.0Defensive Efficiency102.9

2.7Net Efficiency5.2

-2.0Strength of Schedule-0.1

-0.3Last 10 Net Efficiency8.3

68.4Tempo64.8

54.5%Effective FG%53.4%

14.8%Turnover Rate17.2%

26.9%Offensive Rebound %26.3%

30.0%Free Throw Rate27.9%

1.8Average Margin3.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Harvard HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY71.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHarvard holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.6–48.8), defensive efficiency (102.9–109.0), net efficiency (5.2–2.7), strength of schedule (-0.1–-2.0).

Colgate COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (111.7–108.1), shooting efficiency (54.5–53.4), ball security (14.8–17.2).

Final

Colgate

67—78

Harvard

Harvard by 11 • 66.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ColgateTEAM STATHarvard

27-58FG29-59

47.0%FG%49.0%

13-323PT11-29

41.0%3PT%38.0%

null-nullFT9-11

0.0%FT%82.0%

27Rebounds34

4Offensive Rebounds7

13Assists19

12Turnovers10

5Steals10

2Blocks3

11Fouls8

Player Box Score

Colgate

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Parker Jones	G	32	5-12	3-6	0-0	1	3	1	1	13
Nicolas Louis-Jacques	Guard	30	5-10	3-6	0-0	2	1	0	1	13
Chandler Baker	Guard	24	4-9	3-7	0-0	4	1	3	0	11
Blake Forrest	G	23	4-6	1-3	0-0	5	5	0	0	9
Kyle Carlesimo	G	18	3-6	3-6	0-0	2	0	1	0	9
Sam Wright	F	27	4-7	0-1	0-0	6	0	0	0	8
Brady Cummins	G	28	2-8	0-3	0-0	3	2	0	0	4
Cameron Brennan	F	9	0-0	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	0	0
Stevie Clark	G	7	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Josh Ahayere	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Harvard

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Robert Hinton	G	30	8-13	1-3	1-2	9	5	2	0	18
Thomas Batties III	F	36	5-11	3-6	4-4	3	3	2	3	17
Chandler Pigge	G	34	7-11	0-2	2-3	9	3	2	0	16
Tey Barbour	G	13	3-6	3-6	2-2	1	1	2	0	11
Evan Nelson	G	29	2-6	2-5	0-0	4	1	1	0	6
Louis Lesmond	G	33	2-8	1-4	0-0	4	4	1	0	5
Ben Eisendrath	G	13	1-2	1-2	0-0	1	2	0	0	3
Xavier Nesbitt	G	6	1-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Leo Byrne	Forward	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Dutch Dowdell	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.6Possessions66.6

100.6Offensive Efficiency117.1

117.1Defensive Efficiency100.6

-16.5Net Efficiency16.5

57.8%Effective FG%58.5%

57.8%True Shooting %60.7%

18.2%Turnover Rate14.9%

0.0%Free Throw Rate18.6%

55.2%3-Point Rate49.2%

1.08Assist / Turnover1.90

Game Summary

Harvard won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 66.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.