
Merrimack
23-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
40.2%Merrimack
59.8%Butler
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADButler -3.6
PROJECTED TOTAL146.8
MODEL MONEYLINEButler -149

Butler
16-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMerrimack 72
Projected Total146.8
Projected ScoreButler 75
Team Comparison
53.7MMH Power Index52.7
106.4Offensive Efficiency111.7
103.2Defensive Efficiency109.1
3.2Net Efficiency2.6
0.7Strength of Schedule3.1
12.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-8.5
64.4Tempo71.1
49.3%Effective FG%51.2%
14.8%Turnover Rate15.9%
24.7%Offensive Rebound %34.4%
39.5%Free Throw Rate42.9%
2.1Average Margin1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Merrimack HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY59.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–52.7), defensive efficiency (103.2–109.1), net efficiency (3.2–2.6), recent form (12.9–-8.5).
Butler COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (111.7–106.4), strength of schedule (3.1–0.7), shooting efficiency (51.2–49.3).