
Fairfield
21-13GAME THAT MATTERSAT
9.9%Fairfield
90.1%Yale
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADYale -14.4
PROJECTED TOTAL147.3
MODEL MONEYLINEYale -910

Yale
23-7MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreFairfield 66
Projected Total147.3
Projected ScoreYale 81
Team Comparison
50.1MMH Power Index65.4
109.6Offensive Efficiency121.4
105.4Defensive Efficiency105.8
4.2Net Efficiency15.6
-3.4Strength of Schedule1.6
3.3Last 10 Net Efficiency8.9
67.8Tempo64.5
49.1%Effective FG%56.8%
15.0%Turnover Rate13.9%
36.0%Offensive Rebound %33.3%
28.4%Free Throw Rate34.4%
2.8Average Margin10.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Yale HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY90.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMYale holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (65.4–50.1), offensive efficiency (121.4–109.6), net efficiency (15.6–4.2), strength of schedule (1.6–-3.4).
Fairfield COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (105.4–105.8), offensive rebounding (36.0–33.3).