
Tulsa
30-8GAME THAT MATTERSAT
91.1%Tulsa
8.9%Loyola Chicago
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTulsa -15.5
PROJECTED TOTAL152.6
MODEL MONEYLINETulsa -1024

Loyola Chicago
9-24MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTulsa 84
Projected Total152.6
Projected ScoreLoyola Chicago 69
Team Comparison
64.8MMH Power Index39.3
121.1Offensive Efficiency101.0
104.8Defensive Efficiency114.6
16.3Net Efficiency-13.6
0.0Strength of Schedule4.3
10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-8.5
70.2Tempo66.1
55.4%Effective FG%50.1%
15.4%Turnover Rate19.8%
33.8%Offensive Rebound %30.0%
42.4%Free Throw Rate35.7%
11.5Average Margin-9.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tulsa HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY91.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulsa holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.8–39.3), offensive efficiency (121.1–101.0), defensive efficiency (104.8–114.6), net efficiency (16.3–-13.6).
Loyola Chicago COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (4.3–0.0).