
South Carolina Upstate
13-19GAME THAT MATTERSAT
19.6%South Carolina Upstate
80.4%Queens University
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADQueens University -8.2
PROJECTED TOTAL162.0
MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -410

Queens University
21-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSouth Carolina Upstate 77
Projected Total162.0
Projected ScoreQueens University 85
Team Comparison
43.6MMH Power Index51.7
104.5Offensive Efficiency118.4
103.7Defensive Efficiency117.0
0.8Net Efficiency1.4
-3.8Strength of Schedule0.1
-4.9Last 10 Net Efficiency1.5
71.1Tempo71.4
50.3%Effective FG%56.6%
17.6%Turnover Rate14.8%
30.1%Offensive Rebound %29.6%
34.0%Free Throw Rate37.6%
0.6Average Margin0.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Queens University HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY80.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.7–43.6), offensive efficiency (118.4–104.5), net efficiency (1.4–0.8), strength of schedule (0.1–-3.8).
South Carolina Upstate COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (103.7–117.0), offensive rebounding (30.1–29.6).