
Rider
4-25GAME THAT MATTERSAT
22.4%Rider
77.6%Bucknell
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBucknell -8.8
PROJECTED TOTAL141.5
MODEL MONEYLINEBucknell -346

Bucknell
10-23MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreRider 66
Projected Total141.5
Projected ScoreBucknell 75
Team Comparison
29.1MMH Power Index35.7
96.3Offensive Efficiency99.5
115.3Defensive Efficiency112.8
-19.0Net Efficiency-13.3
-0.9Strength of Schedule2.0
-17.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.5
65.9Tempo67.7
43.4%Effective FG%48.4%
17.1%Turnover Rate19.0%
32.8%Offensive Rebound %26.6%
31.5%Free Throw Rate30.7%
-12.6Average Margin-8.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Bucknell HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY77.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBucknell holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (35.7–29.1), offensive efficiency (99.5–96.3), defensive efficiency (112.8–115.3), net efficiency (-13.3–-19.0).
Rider COUNTERS WITHball security (17.1–19.0), offensive rebounding (32.8–26.6), free throw rate (31.5–30.7).