
Queens University
21-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
24.2%Queens University
75.8%East Tennessee State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADEast Tennessee State -9.7
PROJECTED TOTAL161.1
MODEL MONEYLINEEast Tennessee State -313

East Tennessee State
23-11MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 76
Projected Total161.1
Projected ScoreEast Tennessee State 85
Team Comparison
51.7MMH Power Index57.4
118.4Offensive Efficiency115.1
117.0Defensive Efficiency102.8
1.4Net Efficiency12.3
0.1Strength of Schedule-1.6
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency3.7
71.4Tempo67.4
56.6%Effective FG%55.4%
14.8%Turnover Rate15.1%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %28.8%
37.6%Free Throw Rate35.0%
0.9Average Margin8.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Queens University HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY75.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (118.4–115.1), strength of schedule (0.1–-1.6), shooting efficiency (56.6–55.4), ball security (14.8–15.1).
East Tennessee State COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (57.4–51.7), defensive efficiency (102.8–117.0), net efficiency (12.3–1.4).