
Jackson State
12-21GAME THAT MATTERSAT
8.1%Jackson State
91.9%Lipscomb
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLipscomb -18.3
PROJECTED TOTAL154.9
MODEL MONEYLINELipscomb -1135

Lipscomb
18-13MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreJackson State 68
Projected Total154.9
Projected ScoreLipscomb 87
Team Comparison
30.7MMH Power Index47.9
98.1Offensive Efficiency111.3
117.0Defensive Efficiency107.6
-18.9Net Efficiency3.7
-0.7Strength of Schedule-2.5
-6.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.0
71.6Tempo68.8
45.8%Effective FG%54.8%
19.4%Turnover Rate16.0%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %25.9%
37.9%Free Throw Rate26.5%
-13.5Average Margin2.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Lipscomb HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY91.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLipscomb holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.9–30.7), offensive efficiency (111.3–98.1), defensive efficiency (107.6–117.0), net efficiency (3.7–-18.9).
Jackson State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.7–-2.5), offensive rebounding (29.6–25.9), free throw rate (37.9–26.5).