
Longwood
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
6.3%Longwood
93.7%McNeese
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMcNeese -17.5
PROJECTED TOTAL148.4
MODEL MONEYLINEMcNeese -1487

McNeese
27-6MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLongwood 65
Projected Total148.4
Projected ScoreMcNeese 83
Team Comparison
47MMH Power Index66.7
108.1Offensive Efficiency117.4
103.0Defensive Efficiency98.3
5.1Net Efficiency19.1
-6.4Strength of Schedule-1.6
2.3Last 10 Net Efficiency15.5
71.9Tempo66.0
51.4%Effective FG%52.2%
19.3%Turnover Rate13.9%
35.4%Offensive Rebound %37.1%
42.0%Free Throw Rate37.7%
3.6Average Margin12.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
McNeese HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY93.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMcNeese holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (66.7–47.0), offensive efficiency (117.4–108.1), defensive efficiency (98.3–103.0), net efficiency (19.1–5.1).
Longwood COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (42.0–37.7).