
Grambling
14-19GAME THAT MATTERSAT
21.8%Grambling
78.2%USC
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUSC -8.4
PROJECTED TOTAL150.0
MODEL MONEYLINEUSC -359

USC
18-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreGrambling 71
Projected Total150.0
Projected ScoreUSC 79
Team Comparison
41.4MMH Power Index48.3
100.7Offensive Efficiency108.5
100.4Defensive Efficiency107.6
0.3Net Efficiency0.9
-5.7Strength of Schedule2.5
-0.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-16.0
69.9Tempo72.4
49.2%Effective FG%50.7%
20.9%Turnover Rate17.2%
30.4%Offensive Rebound %33.2%
42.2%Free Throw Rate45.3%
0.2Average Margin0.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
USC HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY78.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUSC holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (48.3–41.4), offensive efficiency (108.5–100.7), net efficiency (0.9–0.3), strength of schedule (2.5–-5.7).
Grambling COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.4–107.6), recent form (-0.4–-16.0).