Ohio logo

Ohio

15-17
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
34.0%Ohio
66.0%Texas State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTexas State -5.9
PROJECTED TOTAL152.7
MODEL MONEYLINETexas State -194
Texas State logo

Texas State

19-13
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreOhio 73
Projected Total152.7
Projected ScoreTexas State 79

Team Comparison

48MMH Power Index49.4
109.7Offensive Efficiency107.7
110.7Defensive Efficiency103.4
-1.0Net Efficiency4.3
-0.1Strength of Schedule-4.7
-1.0Last 10 Net Efficiency9.1
71.0Tempo68.6
52.0%Effective FG%51.3%
15.3%Turnover Rate18.4%
28.9%Offensive Rebound %34.3%
37.8%Free Throw Rate36.0%
-0.7Average Margin2.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Texas State HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY66.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTexas State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.4–48.0), defensive efficiency (103.4–110.7), net efficiency (4.3–-1.0), recent form (9.1–-1.0).
Ohio COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (109.7–107.7), strength of schedule (-0.1–-4.7), shooting efficiency (52.0–51.3).
Final
Ohio logo
Ohio
65—74
Texas State logo
Texas State
Texas State by 9 • 62.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

OhioTEAM STATTexas State
19-52FG29-63
37.0%FG%46.0%
8-283PT3-8
29.0%3PT%38.0%
19-25FT13-18
76.0%FT%72.0%
27Rebounds48
8Offensive Rebounds19
10Assists13
7Turnovers10
8Steals6
4Blocks4
17Fouls16

Player Box Score

Ohio
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
AJ ClaytonForward355-134-124-451110018
Aidan HadawayF323-71-36-852220013
Jackson PaveletzkeG343-90-16-942200012
Elmore James IVG283-52-42-233000010
AJ BrownG202-61-31-22120006
Ajay SheldonG161-30-20-01011002
Shereef MitchellGuard151-30-10-02100002
Vic SearlsForward131-30-00-02000002
Elijah ElliottG70-30-20-00000000
Texas State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Tylan PopeForward229-142-34-7101010024
Christian TurnerForward345-90-13-463000013
Kaden GumbsG395-130-02-235100012
Drue DrinnonGuard203-51-24-400100011
Tyrel MorganForward363-80-10-111421006
Joshua O'GarroG343-80-10-07021006
Austin GreenF101-30-00-04000002
Nate DeerF30-20-00-01001000
Bessanty SaragbaF20-10-00-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

62.8Possessions62.8
103.5Offensive Efficiency117.8
117.8Defensive Efficiency103.5
-14.3Net Efficiency14.3
44.2%Effective FG%48.4%
50.9%True Shooting %51.7%
11.1%Turnover Rate16.0%
48.1%Free Throw Rate28.6%
53.8%3-Point Rate12.7%
1.43Assist / Turnover1.30
Game Summary
Texas State won by 9 points. The game played at approximately 62.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.