Drake logo

Drake

14-20
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
4.7%Drake
95.3%Vanderbilt
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -20.0
PROJECTED TOTAL158.6
MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -2028
Vanderbilt logo

Vanderbilt

27-9
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreDrake 69
Projected Total158.6
Projected ScoreVanderbilt 89

Team Comparison

46.4MMH Power Index68.9
109.5Offensive Efficiency120.9
109.1Defensive Efficiency105.7
0.4Net Efficiency15.2
0.3Strength of Schedule7.4
-11.3Last 10 Net Efficiency2.7
68.6Tempo70.9
52.2%Effective FG%55.3%
14.9%Turnover Rate13.5%
27.2%Offensive Rebound %30.8%
34.4%Free Throw Rate39.3%
0.2Average Margin10.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY95.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
11–0
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–46.4), offensive efficiency (120.9–109.5), defensive efficiency (105.7–109.1), net efficiency (15.2–0.4).
Final
Drake logo
Drake
81—70
Vanderbilt logo
Vanderbilt
Drake by 11 • 71.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

DrakeTEAM STATVanderbilt
29-54FG24-54
54.0%FG%44.0%
5-153PT4-21
33.0%3PT%19.0%
18-20FT18-24
90.0%FT%75.0%
37Rebounds20
13Offensive Rebounds9
17Assists8
20Turnovers15
11Steals10
5Blocks3
15Fouls16

Player Box Score

Drake
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Cam ManyawuF318-110-02-2113130018
Mitch MascariGuard404-63-56-641200017
Bennett StirtzG405-140-36-6511200016
Daniel AbreuForward375-81-44-631210015
Tavion BanksG214-71-10-01021009
Isaiah JacksonGuard222-70-20-05120004
Nate FergusonForward81-10-00-03000002
Kael CombsG10-00-00-00000000
Vanderbilt
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jason EdwardsG267-132-510-1110100026
AJ HoggardGuard234-120-31-43110009
MJ Collins Jr.G223-61-32-20000009
Chris ManonGuard142-40-15-51010009
Tyler TannerG273-51-30-02230007
Grant HuffmanGuard273-40-10-04311006
Devin McGlocktonF182-40-10-02111004
Tyler NickelF220-30-30-01111000
Jaylen CareyF210-30-10-22010000

Advanced Game Stats

71.0Possessions71.0
114.1Offensive Efficiency98.6
98.6Defensive Efficiency114.1
15.5Net Efficiency-15.5
58.3%Effective FG%48.1%
63.8%True Shooting %53.5%
28.4%Turnover Rate21.0%
37.0%Free Throw Rate44.4%
27.8%3-Point Rate38.9%
0.85Assist / Turnover0.53
Game Summary
Drake won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 71.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.