
UAB
20-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
82.2%UAB
17.8%Louisiana
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUAB -9.3
PROJECTED TOTAL144.0
MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -462

Louisiana
11-22MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUAB 77
Projected Total144.0
Projected ScoreLouisiana 67
Team Comparison
56.9MMH Power Index38.6
110.5Offensive Efficiency99.3
102.9Defensive Efficiency110.2
7.6Net Efficiency-10.9
0.4Strength of Schedule1.5
2.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-9.0
71.7Tempo64.1
48.8%Effective FG%47.1%
12.4%Turnover Rate16.8%
32.7%Offensive Rebound %28.2%
36.9%Free Throw Rate29.5%
5.4Average Margin-7.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UAB HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY82.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–38.6), offensive efficiency (110.5–99.3), defensive efficiency (102.9–110.2), net efficiency (7.6–-10.9).
Louisiana COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.5–0.4).