IU Indianapolis

7-25

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

29.8%IU Indianapolis

70.2%Alabama A&M

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADAlabama A&M -6.9

PROJECTED TOTAL161.8

MODEL MONEYLINEAlabama A&M -236

Alabama A&M

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreIU Indianapolis 77

Projected Total161.8

Projected ScoreAlabama A&M 84

Team Comparison

IU IndianapolisMetricAlabama A&M

39.2MMH Power Index42.3

109.3Offensive Efficiency105.9

115.5Defensive Efficiency106.6

-6.2Net Efficiency-0.7

-2.5Strength of Schedule-6.8

-9.2Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3

76.4Tempo68.0

52.9%Effective FG%49.7%

15.7%Turnover Rate16.8%

29.6%Offensive Rebound %28.0%

21.5%Free Throw Rate45.7%

-4.8Average Margin-0.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Alabama A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY70.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAlabama A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (42.3–39.2), defensive efficiency (106.6–115.5), net efficiency (-0.7–-6.2), recent form (3.3–-9.2).

IU Indianapolis COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (109.3–105.9), strength of schedule (-2.5–-6.8), shooting efficiency (52.9–49.7).

Final

IU Indianapolis

88—83

Alabama A&M

IU Indianapolis by 5 • 69.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

IU IndianapolisTEAM STATAlabama A&M

24-57FG26-57

42.0%FG%46.0%

12-283PT5-25

43.0%3PT%20.0%

28-32FT26-33

88.0%FT%79.0%

36Rebounds36

13Offensive Rebounds12

11Assists13

10Turnovers8

5Steals4

—Blocks4

23Fouls26

Player Box Score

IU Indianapolis

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Paul Zilinskas	Guard	31	11-20	5-10	5-5	1	2	0	32
Jarvis Walker	Guard	34	3-9	2-5	5-7	2	3	1	13
Sean Craig	F	34	2-5	1-3	6-6	7	1	0	11
Timaris Brown	Forward	18	3-7	1-2	4-4	8	1	0	11
Nathan Dudukovich	Guard	16	3-6	2-4	1-1	2	1	0	9
DeSean Goode	F	27	1-1	0-0	4-5	4	0	2	6
Alec Millender	G	22	1-3	1-3	2-2	2	1	1	5
Keenan Garner	F	13	0-4	0-0	1-2	4	1	1	1
Ron Rutland III	Guard	5	0-2	0-1	0-0	2	1	0	0

Alabama A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Darius Ford	Guard	33	6-12	1-4	7-8	6	7	2	0	20
AC Bryant	G	19	3-5	1-2	10-11	2	1	1	0	17
Chad Moodie	F	32	7-10	0-0	2-6	2	0	0	3	16
Clance Crosby	F	9	3-4	0-0	4-4	2	0	0	0	10
London Riley	Guard	35	3-11	3-11	0-0	0	0	0	0	9
Eric Lee	Guard	16	2-4	0-1	1-1	5	1	1	1	5
Lorenzo Downey	Guard	18	1-5	0-4	0-0	5	2	0	0	2
Aaron Smith	Guard	8	0-2	0-1	2-3	2	0	0	0	2
Bilal Abdur-Rahman	G	6	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Jaylen Colon	Guard	12	0-2	0-2	0-0	3	0	0	0	0
EJay Greer	Guard	7	0-1	0-0	0-0	3	2	0	0	0
Bol Kuir	Forward	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

69.0Possessions69.0

127.5Offensive Efficiency120.3

120.3Defensive Efficiency127.5

7.2Net Efficiency-7.2

52.6%Effective FG%50.0%

60.9%True Shooting %57.1%

14.5%Turnover Rate11.6%

56.1%Free Throw Rate57.9%

49.1%3-Point Rate43.9%

1.10Assist / Turnover1.63

Game Summary

IU Indianapolis won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 69.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.