Clemson

24-10

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

64.2%Clemson

35.8%San Francisco

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADClemson -3.0

PROJECTED TOTAL141.9

MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -179

San Francisco

17-16

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreClemson 72

Projected Total141.9

Projected ScoreSan Francisco 69

Team Comparison

ClemsonMetricSan Francisco

59.9MMH Power Index50.1

112.6Offensive Efficiency110.4

101.4Defensive Efficiency108.2

11.2Net Efficiency2.2

4.6Strength of Schedule1.4

-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-8.7

63.6Tempo67.6

53.0%Effective FG%51.9%

14.0%Turnover Rate16.1%

27.0%Offensive Rebound %31.8%

38.1%Free Throw Rate40.5%

7.2Average Margin1.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Clemson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY64.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–50.1), offensive efficiency (112.6–110.4), defensive efficiency (101.4–108.2), net efficiency (11.2–2.2).

San Francisco COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (31.8–27.0), free throw rate (40.5–38.1).

Final

Clemson

70—55

San Francisco

Clemson by 15 • 61.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ClemsonTEAM STATSan Francisco

28-58FG20-51

48.0%FG%39.0%

7-173PT8-24

41.0%3PT%33.0%

7-10FT7-7

70.0%FT%100.0%

40Rebounds23

14Offensive Rebounds5

14Assists12

12Turnovers13

7Steals5

2Blocks—

14Fouls15

Player Box Score

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ian Schieffelin	Forward	36	7-15	0-4	4-5	13	5	1	1	18
Viktor Lakhin	Center	19	6-11	0-0	0-1	3	1	2	0	12
Dillon Hunter	G	22	4-7	3-4	0-0	6	1	0	0	11
Chase Hunter	Guard	32	3-8	1-2	2-2	3	1	0	0	9
Jaeden Zackery	Not Available	35	2-3	2-2	1-2	1	4	2	0	7
Del Jones	G	19	3-6	0-2	0-0	3	1	0	0	6
Chauncey Wiggins	F	22	2-7	1-3	0-0	6	0	0	0	5
Christian Reeves	C	7	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	1	1	1	2
Jake Heidbreder	G	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Myles Foster	Forward	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0
Asa Thomas	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

San Francisco

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Malik Thomas	G	33	4-12	2-5	4-4	1	1	2	14
Ryan Beasley	G	21	4-7	1-3	0-0	2	2	0	9
Marcus Williams	Guard	28	3-10	2-6	0-0	5	2	2	8
Carlton Linguard Jr.	Center	27	3-7	2-6	0-0	5	2	0	8
Junjie Wang	F	4	2-2	1-1	3-3	2	0	0	8
Ndewedo Newbury	F	28	2-5	0-2	0-0	3	4	1	4
Tyrone Riley IV	G	23	1-2	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	2
James O'Donnell	F	15	1-3	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	2
Jason Rivera-Torres	F	13	0-2	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0
Robby Beasley	Guard	7	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0
Saba Gigiberia	C	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

61.6Possessions61.6

113.6Offensive Efficiency89.3

89.3Defensive Efficiency113.6

24.4Net Efficiency-24.4

54.3%Effective FG%47.1%

55.8%True Shooting %50.6%

19.8%Turnover Rate20.9%

17.2%Free Throw Rate13.7%

29.3%3-Point Rate47.1%

1.17Assist / Turnover0.92

Game Summary

Clemson won by 15 points. The game played at approximately 61.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.