East Texas A&M

11-21

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

38.9%East Texas A&M

61.1%Stonehill

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADStonehill -4.5

PROJECTED TOTAL139.3

MODEL MONEYLINEStonehill -157

Stonehill

12-21

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreEast Texas A&M 67

Projected Total139.3

Projected ScoreStonehill 72

Team Comparison

East Texas A&MMetricStonehill

38.4MMH Power Index37.9

101.2Offensive Efficiency97.5

107.5Defensive Efficiency100.7

-6.3Net Efficiency-3.2

-1.5Strength of Schedule-5.4

-9.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-3.4

69.3Tempo68.1

50.7%Effective FG%48.0%

18.7%Turnover Rate19.1%

26.3%Offensive Rebound %28.4%

31.9%Free Throw Rate29.2%

-4.3Average Margin-2.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

East Texas A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY61.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMEast Texas A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (38.4–37.9), offensive efficiency (101.2–97.5), strength of schedule (-1.5–-5.4), shooting efficiency (50.7–48.0).

Stonehill COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.7–107.5), net efficiency (-3.2–-6.3), recent form (-3.4–-9.1).

Final

East Texas A&M

65—67

Stonehill

Stonehill by 2 • 61.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

East Texas A&MTEAM STATStonehill

25-54FG22-48

46.0%FG%46.0%

7-263PT11-22

27.0%3PT%50.0%

8-12FT12-13

67.0%FT%92.0%

31Rebounds27

11Offensive Rebounds6

8Assists15

12Turnovers14

7Steals8

3Blocks3

15Fouls13

Player Box Score

East Texas A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Scooter Williams	G	25	6-16	0-9	2-2	1	2	2	1	14
Josh Taylor	F	22	4-5	2-3	0-0	6	0	0	1	10
Camerin James	Guard	16	4-6	1-1	0-0	3	0	0	0	9
Khaliq Abdul-Mateen	Guard	33	2-3	1-1	3-4	5	2	1	0	8
Demarco Bethea	F	22	3-5	1-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	7
Mykol Sanchez-Vega	G	14	2-5	1-3	2-2	3	0	2	0	7
KC Ugwuakazi	F	13	2-2	0-0	1-4	5	0	0	1	5
Evan Phelps	G	25	1-4	1-3	0-0	1	2	0	0	3
TJ Thomas	Guard	18	1-5	0-1	0-0	2	1	2	0	2
Tay Mosher	F	12	0-3	0-3	0-0	1	1	0	0	0

Stonehill

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Josh Morgan	Guard	30	6-13	4-8	4-4	3	0	1	0	20
Todd Brogna	F	35	5-10	1-2	5-5	4	4	1	2	16
Amir Nesbitt	Guard	27	4-6	3-4	0-0	1	5	1	0	11
Chas Stinson	G	27	3-6	1-2	3-4	3	0	2	1	10
Hermann Koffi	G	32	3-5	1-3	0-0	3	2	0	0	7
Ethan Meuser	F	21	1-2	1-1	0-0	3	1	0	0	3
Louie Semona	F	11	0-1	0-1	0-0	4	0	1	0	0
Christopher Melis	Forward	11	0-5	0-1	0-0	4	3	1	0	0
Alex Bates IV	Guard	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0
Pearse McGuinn	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

61.5Possessions61.5

105.7Offensive Efficiency108.9

108.9Defensive Efficiency105.7

-3.3Net Efficiency3.3

52.8%Effective FG%57.3%

54.4%True Shooting %61.8%

19.8%Turnover Rate22.5%

22.2%Free Throw Rate27.1%

48.1%3-Point Rate45.8%

0.67Assist / Turnover1.07

Game Summary

Stonehill won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 61.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in True Shooting %, Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.