
UTSA
5-25GAME THAT MATTERSAT
4.2%UTSA
95.8%Troy
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTroy -22.2
PROJECTED TOTAL153.7
MODEL MONEYLINETroy -2281

Troy
22-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUTSA 66
Projected Total153.7
Projected ScoreTroy 88
Team Comparison
30.5MMH Power Index54.1
99.0Offensive Efficiency112.6
115.0Defensive Efficiency103.9
-16.0Net Efficiency8.7
-1.2Strength of Schedule-2.2
-17.6Last 10 Net Efficiency2.0
70.2Tempo70.4
45.9%Effective FG%52.1%
17.0%Turnover Rate17.1%
30.9%Offensive Rebound %35.3%
29.9%Free Throw Rate36.8%
-11.3Average Margin6.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Troy HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY95.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTroy holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.1–30.5), offensive efficiency (112.6–99.0), defensive efficiency (103.9–115.0), net efficiency (8.7–-16.0).
UTSA COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.2–-2.2), ball security (17.0–17.1).