
Clemson
24-10GAME THAT MATTERSAT
81.0%Clemson
19.0%Penn State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADClemson -9.3
PROJECTED TOTAL145.1
MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -426

Penn State
12-20MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreClemson 77
Projected Total145.1
Projected ScorePenn State 68
Team Comparison
59.9MMH Power Index42.3
112.6Offensive Efficiency109.2
101.4Defensive Efficiency117.6
11.2Net Efficiency-8.4
4.6Strength of Schedule5.3
-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-20.8
63.6Tempo67.5
53.0%Effective FG%53.4%
14.0%Turnover Rate15.6%
27.0%Offensive Rebound %25.6%
38.1%Free Throw Rate34.6%
7.2Average Margin-5.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Clemson HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY81.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–42.3), offensive efficiency (112.6–109.2), defensive efficiency (101.4–117.6), net efficiency (11.2–-8.4).
Penn State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.3–4.6), shooting efficiency (53.4–53.0).