
Wyoming
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
69.1%Wyoming
30.9%Tulane
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADWyoming -4.5
PROJECTED TOTAL150.6
MODEL MONEYLINEWyoming -224

Tulane
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreWyoming 78
Projected Total150.6
Projected ScoreTulane 73
Team Comparison
56.1MMH Power Index44.3
113.4Offensive Efficiency105.3
107.7Defensive Efficiency109.9
5.7Net Efficiency-4.6
2.2Strength of Schedule2.7
1.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3
67.8Tempo68.7
52.2%Effective FG%49.6%
16.2%Turnover Rate15.6%
34.6%Offensive Rebound %22.8%
36.7%Free Throw Rate44.8%
3.9Average Margin-3.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Wyoming HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY69.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWyoming holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.1–44.3), offensive efficiency (113.4–105.3), defensive efficiency (107.7–109.9), net efficiency (5.7–-4.6).
Tulane COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–2.2), ball security (15.6–16.2), free throw rate (44.8–36.7).