
Stanford
20-13GAME THAT MATTERSAT
36.0%Stanford
64.0%Grand Canyon
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADGrand Canyon -5.6
PROJECTED TOTAL147.9
MODEL MONEYLINEGrand Canyon -178

Grand Canyon
20-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreStanford 71
Projected Total147.9
Projected ScoreGrand Canyon 77
Team Comparison
59.2MMH Power Index59.8
111.6Offensive Efficiency109.2
107.1Defensive Efficiency99.1
4.5Net Efficiency10.1
5.2Strength of Schedule2.0
7.4Last 10 Net Efficiency9.7
68.1Tempo69.3
51.9%Effective FG%52.1%
15.5%Turnover Rate17.6%
32.4%Offensive Rebound %31.2%
37.2%Free Throw Rate41.0%
3.0Average Margin7.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Grand Canyon HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY64.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrand Canyon holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.8–59.2), defensive efficiency (99.1–107.1), net efficiency (10.1–4.5), recent form (9.7–7.4).
Stanford COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (111.6–109.2), strength of schedule (5.2–2.0), ball security (15.5–17.6).