
Mississippi Valley State
3-30GAME THAT MATTERSAT
3.1%Mississippi Valley State
96.9%Utah
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUtah -23.2
PROJECTED TOTAL152.5
MODEL MONEYLINEUtah -3126

Utah
10-22MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMississippi Valley State 65
Projected Total152.5
Projected ScoreUtah 88
Team Comparison
17.7MMH Power Index43.9
91.1Offensive Efficiency108.8
117.8Defensive Efficiency115.8
-26.7Net Efficiency-7.0
-4.1Strength of Schedule5.1
-17.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-16.3
70.5Tempo68.3
45.8%Effective FG%52.3%
21.8%Turnover Rate16.7%
26.5%Offensive Rebound %28.8%
34.5%Free Throw Rate32.2%
-18.8Average Margin-4.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Utah HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY96.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUtah holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (43.9–17.7), offensive efficiency (108.8–91.1), defensive efficiency (115.8–117.8), net efficiency (-7.0–-26.7).
Mississippi Valley State COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (34.5–32.2).