Grambling

14-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

25.4%Grambling

74.6%Cal Poly

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADCal Poly -6.0

PROJECTED TOTAL156.5

MODEL MONEYLINECal Poly -294

Cal Poly

14-19

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreGrambling 75

Projected Total156.5

Projected ScoreCal Poly 81

Team Comparison

GramblingMetricCal Poly

41.4MMH Power Index46.5

100.7Offensive Efficiency107.2

100.4Defensive Efficiency111.0

0.3Net Efficiency-3.8

-5.7Strength of Schedule1.7

-0.4Last 10 Net Efficiency2.4

69.9Tempo76.6

49.2%Effective FG%52.2%

20.9%Turnover Rate19.8%

30.4%Offensive Rebound %29.9%

42.2%Free Throw Rate35.8%

0.2Average Margin-2.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Cal Poly HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY74.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCal Poly holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (46.5–41.4), offensive efficiency (107.2–100.7), strength of schedule (1.7–-5.7), recent form (2.4–-0.4).

Grambling COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.4–111.0), net efficiency (0.3–-3.8), offensive rebounding (30.4–29.9).

Final

Grambling

79—82

Cal Poly

Cal Poly by 3 • 70.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

GramblingTEAM STATCal Poly

29-61FG32-63

48.0%FG%51.0%

13-263PT9-22

50.0%3PT%41.0%

8-14FT9-12

57.0%FT%75.0%

34Rebounds37

8Offensive Rebounds7

15Assists16

11Turnovers8

4Steals5

7Blocks1

17Fouls10

Player Box Score

Grambling

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Antwan Burnett	G	36	7-13	3-6	4-8	6	3	1	0	21
Cbo Newton	G	30	6-8	5-6	0-0	2	0	0	0	17
Ernest Ross	Forward	32	6-8	2-2	2-4	8	1	0	4	16
Kintavious Dozier	G	30	5-16	0-5	2-2	8	6	2	0	12
P.J. Edwards	G	27	2-5	2-4	0-0	3	1	0	1	6
Mikale Stevenson	G	21	2-6	1-3	0-0	2	2	1	1	5
James Flippin	F	8	1-3	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Emeka Nnaji	Forward	9	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
PJ Eason	F	6	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	1	0
Lou Hutchinson	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Cal Poly

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Owen Koonce	Guard	33	7-10	1-1	2-2	8	3	2	0	17
Isaac Jessup	Guard	31	6-13	5-10	0-0	7	2	0	0	17
Jarred Hyder	Guard	36	4-13	2-7	3-3	2	7	2	0	13
Mac Riniker	Guard	32	6-9	0-0	0-1	6	0	0	0	12
Luka Tarlac	G	16	3-5	0-0	4-4	3	1	1	1	10
Guzman Vasilic	G	12	3-5	1-2	0-0	1	1	0	0	7
Peter Bandelj	G	23	2-7	0-2	0-0	0	1	0	0	4
Kieran Elliott	G	10	1-1	0-0	0-2	3	0	0	0	2
Ethan Menzies	Forward	7	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

70.2Possessions70.2

112.5Offensive Efficiency116.8

116.8Defensive Efficiency112.5

-4.3Net Efficiency4.3

58.2%Effective FG%57.9%

58.4%True Shooting %59.7%

15.6%Turnover Rate11.5%

23.0%Free Throw Rate19.0%

42.6%3-Point Rate34.9%

1.36Assist / Turnover2.00

Game Summary

Cal Poly won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 70.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.