UTSA

5-25

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

4.3%UTSA

95.7%Merrimack

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADMerrimack -20.7

PROJECTED TOTAL142.7

MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -2226

Merrimack

23-11

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUTSA 61

Projected Total142.7

Projected ScoreMerrimack 82

Team Comparison

UTSAMetricMerrimack

30.5MMH Power Index53.7

99.0Offensive Efficiency106.4

115.0Defensive Efficiency103.2

-16.0Net Efficiency3.2

-1.2Strength of Schedule0.7

-17.6Last 10 Net Efficiency12.9

70.2Tempo64.4

45.9%Effective FG%49.3%

17.0%Turnover Rate14.8%

30.9%Offensive Rebound %24.7%

29.9%Free Throw Rate39.5%

-11.3Average Margin2.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Merrimack HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY95.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–30.5), offensive efficiency (106.4–99.0), defensive efficiency (103.2–115.0), net efficiency (3.2–-16.0).

UTSA COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (30.9–24.7).

Final

UTSA

76—74

Merrimack

UTSA by 2 • 75.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UTSATEAM STATMerrimack

28-70FG23-54

40.0%FG%43.0%

10-313PT4-17

32.0%3PT%24.0%

10-16FT24-32

63.0%FT%75.0%

48Rebounds33

21Offensive Rebounds10

10Assists10

20Turnovers15

9Steals14

3Blocks4

22Fouls16

Player Box Score

UTSA

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Primo Spears	Guard	38	11-22	5-9	2-4	5	3	1	0	29
Jonnivius Smith	Forward	28	5-7	0-0	1-2	20	0	2	2	11
Marcus Millender	G	34	3-9	2-6	2-2	2	2	4	0	10
Damari Monsanto	Guard	28	3-12	2-8	0-0	6	3	0	0	8
Raekwon Horton	Forward	31	2-9	0-5	2-4	5	1	1	0	6
Baboucarr Njie	F	21	1-5	0-0	3-4	5	0	1	0	5
Mo Njie	C	12	2-2	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	4
Nazar Mahmoud	G	6	1-3	1-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Skylar Wicks	G	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	1	0	1	0

Merrimack

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Adam Clark	G	37	7-16	0-1	14-18	6	3	4	0	28
Devon Savage	Guard	29	6-12	2-8	1-1	2	0	1	0	15
Bryan Etumnu	F	36	4-6	0-1	4-4	11	3	1	4	12
Sean Trumper	Forward	31	4-8	2-2	0-3	5	1	3	0	10
Tye Dorset	G	16	0-2	0-2	5-5	1	0	2	0	5
Malik Edmead	G	22	2-7	0-0	0-1	2	3	2	0	4
Matt Becht	Guard	22	0-3	0-3	0-0	3	0	0	0	0
David Murray	Forward	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	0	0
Armandas Plintauskas	Guard	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

75.4Possessions75.4

100.8Offensive Efficiency98.1

98.1Defensive Efficiency100.8

2.7Net Efficiency-2.7

47.1%Effective FG%46.3%

49.0%True Shooting %53.5%

26.1%Turnover Rate20.2%

22.9%Free Throw Rate59.3%

44.3%3-Point Rate31.5%

0.50Assist / Turnover0.67

Game Summary

UTSA won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 75.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Turnover Rate, Net Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.