
Gardner-Webb
4-29GAME THAT MATTERSAT
7.8%Gardner-Webb
92.2%Bethune-Cookman
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBethune-Cookman -18.1
PROJECTED TOTAL155.8
MODEL MONEYLINEBethune-Cookman -1182

Bethune-Cookman
17-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreGardner-Webb 69
Projected Total155.8
Projected ScoreBethune-Cookman 87
Team Comparison
26.6MMH Power Index44.2
96.0Offensive Efficiency104.7
120.4Defensive Efficiency106.9
-24.4Net Efficiency-2.2
3.3Strength of Schedule-3.3
-18.2Last 10 Net Efficiency4.0
71.0Tempo72.0
48.8%Effective FG%51.9%
19.2%Turnover Rate19.2%
23.6%Offensive Rebound %30.3%
31.5%Free Throw Rate41.9%
-17.3Average Margin-1.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Bethune-Cookman HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY92.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBethune-Cookman holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (44.2–26.6), offensive efficiency (104.7–96.0), defensive efficiency (106.9–120.4), net efficiency (-2.2–-24.4).
Gardner-Webb COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (3.3–-3.3).