Tulane logo

Tulane

18-15
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
7.9%Tulane
92.1%Belmont
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBelmont -17.6
PROJECTED TOTAL155.1
MODEL MONEYLINEBelmont -1166
Belmont logo

Belmont

26-6
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTulane 69
Projected Total155.1
Projected ScoreBelmont 86

Team Comparison

44.3MMH Power Index61.8
105.3Offensive Efficiency118.6
109.9Defensive Efficiency103.7
-4.6Net Efficiency14.9
2.7Strength of Schedule-0.2
-10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency10.0
68.7Tempo70.7
49.6%Effective FG%60.7%
15.6%Turnover Rate17.8%
22.8%Offensive Rebound %28.8%
44.8%Free Throw Rate32.7%
-3.2Average Margin10.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Belmont HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY92.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBelmont holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (61.8–44.3), offensive efficiency (118.6–105.3), defensive efficiency (103.7–109.9), net efficiency (14.9–-4.6).
Tulane COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–-0.2), ball security (15.6–17.8), free throw rate (44.8–32.7).
Final
Tulane logo
Tulane
66—89
Belmont logo
Belmont
Belmont by 23 • 68.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

TulaneTEAM STATBelmont
23-59FG31-66
39.0%FG%47.0%
6-223PT18-42
27.0%3PT%43.0%
14-18FT9-12
78.0%FT%75.0%
38Rebounds33
14Offensive Rebounds10
11Assists24
15Turnovers7
3Steals5
4Blocks6
15Fouls15

Player Box Score

Tulane
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Asher WoodsG325-102-44-412000016
Rowan BrumbaughG305-103-60-053100013
Mari JordanG285-100-33-360000013
Spencer ElliottF182-30-02-46000006
Kam WilliamsG271-81-52-25411005
Gregg Glenn IIIF202-80-10-08100004
Tyler RinggoldF182-70-20-02001004
KJ GreeneG80-00-03-50111003
Michael EleyG91-30-10-01000002
Logan StephensG80-00-00-01000000
Percy DanielsC20-00-00-00001000
Belmont
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Tyler LundbladeG236-125-100-012000017
Aidan NoyesF175-84-60-070020014
Jonathan PierreForward265-93-70-066210013
Isaiah WalkerG233-102-64-414100012
Carter WhittGuard223-52-32-356200010
Brody PeeblesGuard193-71-32-22200009
Sam OrmeF233-51-20-05003007
Drew ScharnowskiF52-20-01-32000005
Brigham RogersF191-30-00-02100002
Win MillerG80-10-10-01000000
Jake DykstraG70-20-20-00200000
Keith RobbinsG40-10-10-00000000
Aidan BracciaG40-10-10-00100000

Advanced Game Stats

68.7Possessions68.7
96.1Offensive Efficiency129.5
129.5Defensive Efficiency96.1
-33.5Net Efficiency33.5
44.1%Effective FG%60.6%
48.9%True Shooting %62.1%
21.9%Turnover Rate10.2%
30.5%Free Throw Rate18.2%
37.3%3-Point Rate63.6%
0.73Assist / Turnover3.43
Game Summary
Belmont won by 23 points. The game played at approximately 68.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.