
Tulane
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
7.9%Tulane
92.1%Belmont
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBelmont -17.6
PROJECTED TOTAL155.1
MODEL MONEYLINEBelmont -1166

Belmont
26-6MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTulane 69
Projected Total155.1
Projected ScoreBelmont 86
Team Comparison
44.3MMH Power Index61.8
105.3Offensive Efficiency118.6
109.9Defensive Efficiency103.7
-4.6Net Efficiency14.9
2.7Strength of Schedule-0.2
-10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency10.0
68.7Tempo70.7
49.6%Effective FG%60.7%
15.6%Turnover Rate17.8%
22.8%Offensive Rebound %28.8%
44.8%Free Throw Rate32.7%
-3.2Average Margin10.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Belmont HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY92.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBelmont holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (61.8–44.3), offensive efficiency (118.6–105.3), defensive efficiency (103.7–109.9), net efficiency (14.9–-4.6).
Tulane COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–-0.2), ball security (15.6–17.8), free throw rate (44.8–32.7).