
UTEP
11-20GAME THAT MATTERSAT
31.7%UTEP
68.3%UNC Greensboro
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUNC Greensboro -5.0
PROJECTED TOTAL152.4
MODEL MONEYLINEUNC Greensboro -215

UNC Greensboro
15-19MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUTEP 74
Projected Total152.4
Projected ScoreUNC Greensboro 79
Team Comparison
44.4MMH Power Index46.7
102.6Offensive Efficiency112.6
107.1Defensive Efficiency115.3
-4.5Net Efficiency-2.7
1.7Strength of Schedule-1.9
-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2
67.6Tempo69.8
49.2%Effective FG%52.8%
17.3%Turnover Rate14.6%
27.6%Offensive Rebound %28.7%
35.6%Free Throw Rate41.7%
-3.1Average Margin-1.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UNC Greensboro HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY68.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUNC Greensboro holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (46.7–44.4), offensive efficiency (112.6–102.6), net efficiency (-2.7–-4.5), recent form (2.2–-4.7).
UTEP COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (107.1–115.3), strength of schedule (1.7–-1.9).