SMU logo

SMU

20-14
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
73.7%SMU
26.3%Washington State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSMU -6.0
PROJECTED TOTAL161.7
MODEL MONEYLINESMU -280
Washington State logo

Washington State

12-20
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSMU 84
Projected Total161.7
Projected ScoreWashington State 78

Team Comparison

62.5MMH Power Index48.7
118.2Offensive Efficiency110.0
109.6Defensive Efficiency112.0
8.6Net Efficiency-2.0
7.0Strength of Schedule3.3
-1.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.5
71.1Tempo69.2
55.7%Effective FG%54.9%
15.7%Turnover Rate18.8%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %29.7%
31.3%Free Throw Rate31.3%
6.1Average Margin-1.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

SMU HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY73.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–0
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSMU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.5–48.7), offensive efficiency (118.2–110.0), defensive efficiency (109.6–112.0), net efficiency (8.6–-2.0).
Final
SMU logo
SMU
77—60
Washington State logo
Washington State
SMU by 17 • 63.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

SMUTEAM STATWashington State
28-66FG21-57
42.0%FG%37.0%
5-153PT10-33
33.0%3PT%30.0%
16-19FT8-15
84.0%FT%53.0%
51Rebounds25
22Offensive Rebounds8
12Assists12
9Turnovers8
4Steals6
3Blocks6
14Fouls16

Player Box Score

SMU
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Boopie MillerG313-81-29-1035100016
Chuck HarrisGuard254-82-34-450120014
B.J. EdwardsG255-131-32-253000013
Samet YigitogluC296-90-00-0112010012
Kario OquendoGuard275-121-30-040000011
Matt CrossForward373-90-21-110220007
Yohan TraoreF232-70-20-05000004
Keon Ambrose-HyltonForward20-00-00-20000000
Jerrell ColbertF10-00-00-00000000
Washington State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Nate CalmeseG356-173-90-036200015
LeJuan WattsF324-61-33-631010012
Ethan PriceForward314-102-62-221000012
Isaiah WattsG373-102-71-35242009
Dane ErikstrupForward242-51-40-01202005
Kase WynottG221-31-30-02000003
ND OkaforF131-50-01-23001003
Tomas ThrastarsonG60-10-11-21000001

Advanced Game Stats

63.1Possessions63.1
122.0Offensive Efficiency95.1
95.1Defensive Efficiency122.0
26.9Net Efficiency-26.9
46.2%Effective FG%45.6%
51.3%True Shooting %46.8%
14.5%Turnover Rate12.5%
28.8%Free Throw Rate26.3%
22.7%3-Point Rate57.9%
1.33Assist / Turnover1.50
Game Summary
SMU won by 17 points. The game played at approximately 63.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.