
Kennesaw State
21-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
30.8%Kennesaw State
69.2%UC Irvine
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUC Irvine -6.5
PROJECTED TOTAL155.0
MODEL MONEYLINEUC Irvine -225

UC Irvine
23-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreKennesaw State 74
Projected Total155.0
Projected ScoreUC Irvine 81
Team Comparison
55.7MMH Power Index58.4
113.6Offensive Efficiency106.9
104.3Defensive Efficiency95.0
9.3Net Efficiency11.9
-2.8Strength of Schedule-1.0
4.5Last 10 Net Efficiency10.0
72.9Tempo72.3
52.2%Effective FG%50.7%
16.3%Turnover Rate17.6%
35.7%Offensive Rebound %33.1%
44.9%Free Throw Rate36.5%
6.8Average Margin8.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UC Irvine HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY69.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUC Irvine holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.4–55.7), defensive efficiency (95.0–104.3), net efficiency (11.9–9.3), strength of schedule (-1.0–-2.8).
Kennesaw State COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (113.6–106.9), shooting efficiency (52.2–50.7), ball security (16.3–17.6).